The Pipistrel Sinus has detachable wingtips and wing extensions.
However, they designed the plane with a wing core span at 39'11", just barely larger than a standard "40' door" (which is actually closer to 39', since the hangar structure itself eats into the 40' width).
As can be seen in the below video, it's just barely possible to fit it into a standard 40' hangar. But I don't think anyone would say it's practical, it's just that it's possible.
This wingspan has greatly limited the airplane's appeal in the US market, and this leaves me thinking that there is some crucially important physical or regulatory reason why Pipistrel didn't make the tips sections slightly longer so the core section could have been slightly smaller.
In contrast, the Phoenix LSA has designed their wings so that the core section is 35' wide, even though the full wingspan is only inches shorter than the Pipistrel Sinus:
What was worth trading off readily fitting in the vast majority of US hangars for an extra couple inches of core wing? Maybe Pipistrel doesn't consider the US as a likely motorglider market to begin with, and so they unapologetically optimized for their home market?
Update:
@StephenS points out that the official tip-less wingspan is 39'11", so technically 1" under the 40'. I stand corrected and have adjusted the question.