Inspired by this question about breaking the glass of instruments, I was wondering if a sufficient level of vacuum can be achieved by using a vacuum cleaner on the inlet, or simply sucking through a straw connected to the vacuum inlet, in case the artificial horizon's vacuum pump failed?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You go flying with a vacuum cleaner and a straw? Wow. :) $\endgroup$
    – Simon
    Commented Oct 21, 2014 at 21:47
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ you don't? You are violating FAR 112.3 section 6b: Emergency use of straws in flight $\endgroup$
    – user60684
    Commented Oct 24, 2014 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ my airplane M20M has a standby vacuum pump $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Commented Oct 27, 2014 at 14:58

1 Answer 1


The answer is a qualified yes: It's theoretically possible, but wholly impractical to provide a pressure source to your gyros from within the cockpit, at least the way you're describing.

Air-Driven gyros require a relatively constant pressure differential somewhere between 4 and 6 inches of mercury to operate correctly (this can be "suction" or "pressure", but as vacuum/suction systems are more common let's stick with that term). We can split the difference and say we want to supply 5 inches of vacuum (which is usually right in the middle of the "green arc" for most vacuum gauges) - this is sufficient suction to keep the rotor spinning at an appropriate RPM so the instruments function as expected.

Because a constant vacuum is required we can kill off one of the options: You won't be able to suck air through a straw to do this -- you would be constantly over-speeding or under-speeding the gyro rotor as you produce either too much vacuum (inhaling) or not enough (when you have to let go of the straw to exhale).
The variable pressure would vary the rotor speed, and your instruments would be totally unreliable within a few breaths, defeating the purpose of the exercise.

A household vacuum can provide the necessary pressure differential (these fine vacuum-rating folks tell me that "An average vacuum will have a [suction] rating of around 80 inches of water", which Google tells me is around 5.9 inches of mercury. If you could hook the vacuum up to the aircraft's system downstream of the vacuum regulator (where the main vacuum pump hooks up) you could theoretically power your gyros normally.
There are some caveats to using a vacuum cleaner idea besides the obvious "How are you going to hook the vacuum up to the system?" question:

  • The vacuum cleaner specifications are presumably at or near sea level - they might not be able to provide adequate suction at higher altitudes.
  • Powering the vacuum cleaner in this scenario is left as an exercise for the reader (most aircraft with air-driven gyros don't have household AC power in the cockpit - you could install an inverter, but vacuums pull quite a lot of power, so you'd need a high-amperage circuit to supply it. The draw from the vacuum may exceed the capacity of the plane's electrical system, and to remedy that we're getting into complicated major alterations...)

There are other more practical alternatives to an engine-driven vacuum pump to consider if you're worried about the reliability of your vacuum source:

  • Precise Flight makes a standby vacuum system that ties into the engine intake.
    For normally-aspirated engines this works well as long as the engine is operating at part throttle: The manifold pressure differential is sufficient that it can supply suction for your gyros. The downside is that you can't guarantee a stable vacuum source: at full throttle there will probably not be sufficient suction to operate the gyros (particularly at altitude).
  • Pneumatic venturi tubes can be used to supply vacuum for aircraft in flight.
    These are bolted on to the airframe and use the slipstream air moving through a venturi to create the necessary vacuum. In extremely slow flight these may also fail to provide adequate vacuum. Venturi tube
  • Electric standby vacuum pumps are a popular option as they offer you the ability to keep using your main vacuum instruments regardless of throttle position or airspeed. The primary drawbacks are weight, space (for the installation), and power to run the motor.
  • Electric gyro instruments are a popular option (though somewhat expensive): They provide a backup for the air-driven system using an independent power source.
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Great Answer, but I'll dispute a few details... The gyros have sufficient inertia that the unsteadiness of the vacuum caused by pausing to exhale would not likely cause the instruments to be unreliable. Listen to the gyros spin down after a flight to observe their inertia. The operation of the AI and HI instruments do not require a finely controlled, RPM of the gyro, so long as the RPM is adequate. They provide a reference frame, not using metered precession for their primary function. The bigger problem is running out of self-generated suction before losing consciousness. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ If you have a loose instrument, ^this^ is kind of fun to attempt. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 23:38
  • $\begingroup$ Without taking data on performance of my Kirby at cabin pressures over FL200, I'm going to take an educated guess that powering a couple instruments is well within it's power capability. The vacuum will be working with less-dense air at altitude, resulting in a higher rpm, but when the vacuum is loaded with a restricted flow, that RPM will likely drop significantly. Remember the Kirby must produce a gauge pressure to operate the instruments, which it will still be able to do unless the air is so thin that it cannot spin at a high enough RPM to get the job done. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2015 at 23:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @2NinerRomeo Overspeed/Underspeed of the rotor in an attitude gyro can induce "interesting" overshoot/lag errors. Yes, the instrument will still function, but its accuracy may be degraded (and you have no way of verifying it in actual IMC). Re: a vacuum cleaner's performance at altitude, a vacuum is effectively a large fan moving a given volume of air. There are articles that cover this in more detail than I can. $\endgroup$
    – voretaq7
    Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 2:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (I would certainly be open to a vacuum cleaner powered gyro test - if someone wants to offer up a vacuum cleaner, an appropriate power source, and a sacrificial gyro I'd be happy to take the test rig flying & see how it behaves - it would be a cool experiment. I'm not taking the straw test up though, I'm not fond of having my passengers pass out :-D ) $\endgroup$
    – voretaq7
    Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 2:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .