10
$\begingroup$

During the first half of 1942, US Navy SBD bombers had problems with their bomb aiming scopes fogging over, which reduced the accuracy of their bombing during several early war operations. Was this resolved by better scopes, improvements to the existing scopes or replacing them with reflector sights?

$\endgroup$
9

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The fogging problems were solved by switching from a telescopic to a reflective gun sight.

From The Dauntless Dive Bomber of World War Two by Barrett Tillman, chapter 1:

The SBD-1 through the -4 were equipped with a three-power telescopic sight, a holdover from the open-cockpit aircraft of the thirties. The pilot looked through the tube, lining up the crosshairs on the target while keeping a ball much like that of a turn-and-bank indicator centered in its groove. The centered ball told him the aircraft was level in the dive, otherwise the bomb would go off on a tangent when released. The drawback to the telescopic sight was its tendency to fog over in a dive from high altitude because of a sudden change of temperature, and the resulting condensation clouded the lens. The windscreen was also prone to fogging, and pilots said the tubular sight was inadequate for aerial gunnery since it severely limited the field of vision.

The answer was a reflector gunsight nearly identical to those used in fighter aircraft.

Beginning with the SBD-5, Mark VIII reflecting gunsights were installed, as were heaters for the windscreens. These measures eliminated the problem and were instrumental in improving bombing accuracy. But they were not available until 1943. ”

An image of the Mk. VIII reflecting sight mentioned, provided by the US Air Force Museum:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is something wrong here because telescopes can be reflectors. Both mirrors and lenses can fog. Modern high quality mirrors are made of the same glass as high quality lenses, but with a thin metal coating. The cause of the fogging is the heat capacity of the glass. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 17, 2022 at 3:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .