23
$\begingroup$

This is a theoretical question, the belt sander is an analogy to help visualize. How would a rectangular wing that is able to make its outer skin circulate around the airfoil perimeter perform?

Feasibility issues aside, would this contraption help delaying airflow separation at high AoA ?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
9
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ One prototype of the yov-10a bronco had a rotating-cylinder-flap concept. It enabled a flap deflection to up to 80°, thereby postponning stall. The problem was, that a real wing is bending and therefore the rotating part of this flap has to be designed according to the experienced bending, which was a challenge. Found a report about the concept here: blackpony.org/v4-yov10a881nasarep.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Artur
    Mar 21 at 10:40
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Related? youtube.com/watch?v=hBq-gNkBZWw Also-- ultra-simple demonstration of rotating cylinder creating lift-- hold sytrafoam drink cup horizontally, open palm of one hand on top, open palm of other hand on bottom, give it a hard spin as you throw it, if spin direction is such that top surface is moving away from direction of travel (the more natural way to throw it), cup "flies" a long way, if spin direction is such that top surface is moving toward direction of travel, flight path curves sharply earthward and cup quickly hits ground-- $\endgroup$ Mar 21 at 12:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I find the belt sander hilarious in an aviation.se post. Look at it chillin'! $\endgroup$ Mar 22 at 7:50
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ "now with included de-icing system" $\endgroup$
    – EarlGrey
    Mar 22 at 14:12
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Related : Flettner Rotor - related to the Magnus Effect $\endgroup$
    – J...
    Mar 22 at 17:03

1 Answer 1

29
$\begingroup$

RE "Feasibility issues aside, would this contraption help delaying airflow separation at high AoA?":

According to a team that tested it, yes:

The major advantages of a Magnus effect device are high-lift forces or rather high wing-loading and stall resistance [...]

Their design housed the treadmill in such a way that only the upper moving surface is exposed. According to their tables, they tested only up to 5° AOA. They acknowledge the complexity and added weight—and I'll add to that, reduced thrust and fuel capacity to power and house the system, respectively.

enter image description here

Side note: if the goal is not a novel STOL RC plane, one popular and tested method for high AOA is leading-edge root extensions (LERX).


$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is a great find, even if I don't get why they only test a small portion on the upperwing in the first place. Maybe it's the result of previous testings. $\endgroup$
    – qq jkztd
    Mar 22 at 8:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.