5
$\begingroup$

For a vertical takeoff vehicle like a helicopter, how the takeoff decision point is defined or computed? Look at the snapshot below, seems the height of TDP is related to the rejected takeoff distance? What is its relationship with obstacles and rejected takeoff distance? enter image description here

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Short answer

The TDP is part of the takeoff profiles provided by the manufacturer for any category A helicopter. Its height is selected based on helicopter performances determined by flight testing. Profiles includes a back-up takeoff used for small takeoff areas:

Back-up profile

Source

In this profile, the helicopter first moves backward to get away from obstacles, following a slope which angle is provided by the manufacturer. Height of the TDP can be increased up to a maximum, in order to meet both the minimal rejected takeoff distance and the minimal clearance for one engine out climb (amber curve), provided the rearward flight is remote from obstacles below (safety zone):

Back-up profile extension

Source


Performance class and helicopter category

Helicopters are required to operate under a performance class, which determines how safe the operation is in case of single engine failure (OEI = one engine inoperative). TDP is associated with performance class 1 (PC1), which imposes a safe takeoff phase, with a safe climb in OEI after passing the TDP, and a safe rejected takeoff (RTO) prior to the TDP. PC1 TDP plays a role similar to V1 for in balanced field takeoff for planes.

PC1

Source

PC1 operations are usually required by local regulation for 20+ passenger helicopters and/or IFR operations.

Helicopters belong to two certification category: A and B. A helicopters are those able to perform in PC1. For these aircraft the manufacturer provides takeoff profiles including a TDP. There are often three profiles: Runway takeoff where the helicopter leaves the ground in a short vertical climb before flying forward over a clearway, back-up takeoff where it flies up and backward until reaching the TDP, and then flyes forward above obstacles, and a vertical profile to takeoff from elevated helipads (like tower roofs) with low visibility on the lift off area.

The principle with these profiles is the pilot is always able to abord the takeoff before reaching the TDP, and always able to climb after passing the TDP.

By using the back-up profile (example), the helicopter can increase its height while maintaining the RTO distance to the FATO (final approach/takeoff area). After reaching the TDP, the helicopter can fly forward clear of obstacles to gain speed and reach VTOSS.

Regulation for Category A in the US

As an example of regulation requiring the TDP to be defined, let's take US/FAA. This regulation is based on recommendations from ICAO Annex 6, Part 3, from which this diagram is taken (10.7m = 35ft):

Back-up profile

From FAA AC29-2C:

Category A takeoff performance must be scheduled so that:

(1) If an engine failure is recognized at the Takeoff Decision Point (TDP) or at any point in the takeoff profile prior to attaining TDP, the rotorcraft must be able to land safely within the established rejected takeoff distance.

Flight testing to determine the Category A rejected takeoff distance is very similar to height-velocity testing and should be approached with caution.

(2) If an engine failure is recognized at the TDP or at any subsequent point in the Category A takeoff profile, a continued safe climb-out capability must be assured. The continued takeoff for conventional Category A runway profiles is designed to allow acquisition of the takeoff safety speed (VTOSS) at a minimum of 35 feet above the takeoff surface and a positive rate of climb

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for clarifications, if I understand correctly that higher obstacles requires higher TDP to clear the obstacles, higher TDP requires longer reject distance, so how the reject distance could be computed then? $\endgroup$
    – VvV
    Oct 19 at 1:10
  • $\begingroup$ TDP is part of the manufacturer takeoff profiles. For an example see page 7. The height can be increased, and a back-up takeoff can be used if this is not sufficient. With the later, the TDP can be moved along a slope, which angle is given in the profile. This allows to find the location meeting both obstacle clearance and rejected take off distance. More examples. $\endgroup$
    – mins
    Oct 19 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent answer, but really isn't the graphic and explanation contained in the question a condensed version of this? (you even included three very similar versions of the same profile view!) $\endgroup$ Oct 19 at 3:48
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelHall: Thanks for the feedback. I've restructured the content. $\endgroup$
    – mins
    Oct 19 at 14:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.