14
$\begingroup$

On several B77 photos, I notice that flaps just behind the engines are not always coordinated with the others flaps. On this photo flaps are extended but not behind the engine whereas on this photo all flaps are extended. Given the position of this particular flap, I suppose there is something to do with the interaction between flaps and engine. Given the difference between the two photos, it may also have something to do with spoiler extension.

EDIT: OK the two photos are not the same plane, but I find a video where it is obvious this piece of flap is not always coordinated with the rest of the flaps. When looking at the video I first thought it was a flaperon, but after the flaps are extended, it deflects upward several times without making the plane banking.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ they are different models of planes, in the table below the first is a B777-333/ER while the second is a B777-222/ER, $\endgroup$ – ratchet freak Sep 30 '14 at 10:10
14
$\begingroup$

It is called "inboard aileron" or "high-speed aileron" and is actually a flaperon. It will deflect with the flaps but not extend backwards. At high speed, the outboard ailerons are locked and all roll control is achieved by deflecting the inboard ailerons (and spoilers, if needed). This helps to reduce wing torsion and twist.

Background: Since the trailing edge's sweep angle has a break at the wing station of the engine, and since in Boeing aircraft the flaps extend perpendicularly to the hinge line, there must be a gap between inboard and outboard flaps, otherwise they would collide during extension. This gap is best placed in the station of the engine blast, and is filled with a simple hinged flap. Note that Airbus aircraft have rear-sliding flaps, which stay at a constant span location and can be adjacent to each other even at the wing station of the sweep change.

BAe Boeing 767 from below with flaps extended for take-off

Boeing 767 from below. Picture by Adrian Pingstone (source)

The picture is of a Boeing 767, but shows the flap arrangement nicely. Note the offset of the forward and rear part of the Küchemann bodies which house the flap tracks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I found other videos where we can see both this flaperon and the outboard ailerons. Indeed it is coordinated with other roll control surface (aileron and spoilers) $\endgroup$ – Manu H Oct 4 '14 at 15:10
  • $\begingroup$ I disagree with that statement. The 737 has flaps that extend to be completely flush with each other, despite the fact they have non co-linear hinge lines. Why not use the same design for the flaps as a 737 and place the flaperon more outboard to achieve better roll control? $\endgroup$ – Jason Jul 12 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/66523/… $\endgroup$ – Jason Jul 12 at 17:22
  • $\begingroup$ You might find some answers on that here: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/43093/… . $\endgroup$ – Bram Jul 12 at 17:27
6
$\begingroup$

To expand slightly on ratchet freak's comment, they're different models of plane, with different engines. The first photo is a 777-300ER with General Electric engines (the only kind fitted on -300ERs); the second is a 777-200ER with Pratt and Whitney engines (one of three engine options). Looking at other photos, it appears that the flaps directly behind the engines of -300ERs don't extend nearly as far as those on the rest of the wing.

And note that there are significant differences between the -200ER and -300ER. For example,

  • the fuselage of the -300ER is 10m longer and the wingspan is 4m longer;
  • the -300ER seats 70+ more people;
  • the maximum take-off weight of the -300ER is about 40 tonnes higher.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.