1
$\begingroup$

Can the 250nm XC required for the instrument rating per 61.65(d)(iii)(A) also count for the 100nm day dual commercial XC required in 61.129(3)(iii)?

My 250nm XC during instrument training included a leg that exceeded 100nm from the departure field. Simply put: have people been able to get away with "double dipping" on this requirement? I read a LOI stating that you couldn't apply requirements for a certificate while pursuing another certificate.

However, an instrument rating is a rating, NOT a certificate.

Thoughts?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It appears that you can do that, because you would be using a portion of training with specific requirements to comply with another training with general requirements. The LOI appears to state that's ok, but the opposite is not. $\endgroup$ Jun 8 at 3:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The wording DAY VFR was removed from the 61.129(a)(3)(iii) regulation in October 2009. I was about to respond that I was told it needed to be day VFR but since I did that requirement the regulation has changed. $\endgroup$
    – wbeard52
    Jun 8 at 4:08
2
$\begingroup$

First, see this question for some extra context. As a general statement, you can use instrument training to count towards commercial training, but only if you can demonstrate that it met the commercial requirements.

If you look at the commercial XC requirements, you can see it explicitly requires that the training has to be to commercial standards:

(3) 20 hours of training on the areas of operation listed in §61.127(b)(1) of this part that includes at least

[...]

(iii) One 2-hour cross country flight in a single engine airplane in daytime conditions that consists of a total straight-line distance of more than 100 nautical miles from the original point of departure;

So what does that mean for you? Well, if you can prove that your IR XC training was to commercial standards then you can double dip it. Perhaps you're at a flight school that deliberately plans and documents things that way. Or your IR instructor is willing to endorse your logbook with the remark that the IR XC was conducted to commercial standards.

On the other hand, if you did your instrument rating ten years ago and only started working on your commercial recently, it would probably be tough to "provide evidence" (as the FAA puts it) that your IR XC was indeed to commercial standards.

You could ask the DPE who'll do your checkride what they're looking for, although that draws attention to the question and you might not know which DPE you'll use. So all in all, if there's any doubt about whether your IR XC was to commercial standards, the simplest thing is simply to go fly a new, commercial XC with your instructor.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.