With fly-by-wire and computers between pilot's command and flight control surfaces, it is easy to imagine the implementation of an autopilot inside the computer, but I read somewhere that autopilots existed before WW2. They were made only to maintain altitude and heading, but worked at a that time with the mechanical linked between pilot and control surfaces.

How did these old autopilots work?

  • $\begingroup$ "Clockwork" nav teardowns: 1 2 $\endgroup$ – RedGrittyBrick Sep 2 '14 at 14:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, Wilbur borrowed a pair Orville's suspenders, and tied them to the wheel.... $\endgroup$ – CGCampbell Sep 2 '14 at 16:06
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Have to add a note: doing a google image search for suspenders autopilot is NSFW, at least at my work site. $\endgroup$ – CGCampbell Sep 2 '14 at 16:12

The autopilot controls hydraulic actuator that is connected to the control link at some point. Since power transfer in the link is bidirectional, the control column moves when autopilot operates it. The same goes for thrust levers operated by autothrust.

If the pilot fights it, the autopilot will increase the force applied up to some limit at which it will disconnect. It can't really recognize whether the force is from the pilot or due to aerodynamic forces, but that's all right, because it should disconnect both if the pilot tries to yank the controls and when keeping the plane in the selected attitude requires too large control input (e.g. hard up elevator because the plane is too slow).

Boeing aircraft maintains this behaviour even on models with fly-by-wire (B777 and B787). Airbus did remove the feedback, because the command given does not directly correspond to control surface position anyway. So far I believe the only other civilian aircraft without feedback is Sukhoi Su-100.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Nothing personal, but I'm not sure why this is the accepted answer. While the information is valid, it doesn't seem to answer the question of how mechanical autopilots work. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Feb 22 '16 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ @freeman the description states the OP (me) asks for the implementation of autopilot's control suggesting an explanation on interference with pilot's command. $\endgroup$ – Manu H Nov 8 '19 at 16:23

It used a set of gyroscopes and pendulums that would correct the plane's attitude when it deviates. They were usually enhanced with pneumatic or hydraulic power to actually move the control surfaces.

For example the V-1 flying bomb (WW2 German UAV) could fly across the Channel and initiate a dive after a preset distance. It remained on course using a pendulum for pitch control and a gyroscope for yaw control. It used its inherent stability for roll control (no ailerons).

  • $\begingroup$ Does that mean that the pilot see the control moving and then can be harmed? Does he have to force if the autopilot does not disconnect? $\endgroup$ – Manu H Sep 2 '14 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ @ManuH: Both autopilot and pilot move the controls gently. So he can see, and feel, them moving, but won't be harmed. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Sep 11 '14 at 12:47

In airplanes without hydraulic actuators on the primary flight surfaces an autopilot usually consists of servos and a computer. The servos lock onto the cables that control the primary flight surfaces. When the autopilot moves the cable you can visibly see the control yoke move the proper amount. It is not fast and will not cause damage.

The computer is monitoring the pitot/static instruments through the associated air data computer and the gyroscopic instruments through the associated attitude/heading reference system. Through algorithms, the autopilot computer controls the airplane.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This answer does not really answer the question either. $\endgroup$ – SMS von der Tann Feb 23 '16 at 12:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.