During situations where multiple people are in danger, I am wondering whether you can have a huge net mounted between 2 helicopters on a device with 2 arms on each helicopter, and when need to rescue, both devices would extend the arms to provide 4 points to connect a huge net, drop it down and then people in danger can just jump on it. Possible applications could be in firefighting or rescue offshore.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Compared with a hoist, the "what could go wrong" list with this idea seems pretty lengthy, between the risks of colliding helos (big fire, big updrafts, major turbulence) and the fact that if the two helos get even a little out of position, the victims get tipped or bounced off the net. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jan 21, 2021 at 3:08
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ “situations where multiple people are in danger” - such as suspended in a net between two helicopters? I wonder how many such people might decide that they didn’t need rescuing after all :-) $\endgroup$
    – Frog
    Jan 21, 2021 at 19:48

1 Answer 1


Could you? Well - technically, yes. For a little while anyway... Would you actually do it to enact effective rescue operations? No.

There's countless issues with the idea that would make it rather impractical, but I had fun thinking of some of the challenges.

For starters, the net would end up being rather rectangular. The short edges would be as long as the arms on the helicopters could be (which couldn't get too long before they get in the way of landing, flying, etc.), but then you'd need to be able to keep good separation between the two craft so the net would be quite long and thin. The shorter the net was between the two craft, the more responsive it would be to changes in altitude, distance, etc. between the two craft, making the ride even worse. So you'd want it to be long.

You can try this at home - grab a scarf or something similar, and try and hold it out fairly flat between your outstretched arms, with a little action man or barbie doll sitting on it, while going for a walk around the house. You'll be constantly adjusting your arms to keep it flat while in motion and it's still going to be a bouncy ride for your passenger.

The longer the net is, the more drag it will experience, further exacerbating the ride as the drag would be tugging the helicopters around. It wouldn't be very long before the net is pulled tight, at which point the weakest link will fail - the net might tear, but lets pretend it's very strong - the net would be pulled off the arms, the arms might be pulled off the helicopter, or a helicopter might be pulled out of the air.

I did have an idea to help reduce drag... once you've got your passengers on the net (I'll come back to challenges with that), you could have one or both helicopters execute a series of rolls or loops (depending on whether the arms are mounted to a side, or to the front) in order to twist the net up to reduce its surface area! This would have the added benefit of snugly securing your passengers inside the twists of the net.

As for people boarding the net - you'd have to lay it carefully on a flat, open stretch of ground or water. The helicopters would need to either land or very carefully hover, coordinating the entire time in order to not tangle or crash. At which point the person boarding the net could just go for a short jog (or swim) over to one of the helicopters, and board that instead (winched up in the case of water). I'm a bit of a daredevil so I might actually still opt for the net, but in my final seconds (which began counting already when I made that decision) I'd feel pretty guilty about likely destroying two helicopters, the lives of the pilots and crew, and their families.

But oh boy it would be one heck of a ride!

  • $\begingroup$ +1 for "series of rolls or loops ... to twist the net up to reduce its surface area"! $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jan 21, 2021 at 16:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .