From what I understand, the purpose of a variable-pitch propeller (be it manually adjustable, or constant speed) is that it allows the engine to always operate at its most efficient speed, much like the transmission of a car. Is that correct? If so, if an airplane were to accomplish that another way (say, a hybrid gas-electric drive, or an actual transmission with shiftable gears*), would there be any other advantage to having an adjustable propeller?

*No, I don't know why you would want to mount a car transmission on an airplane. It's a hypothetical question. But now I have this picture in my head of a twin-engine plane with two gear shifts in the cockpit and two clutch pedals next to the rudder pedals.


The comparison with a car's gearbox is unfortunate, and leads to misunderstandings...

At the small airspeeds typical of takeoff, the inflow at the rotor plane is small too, and the prop needs a small amount of pitch in order to produce a large amount of thrust at maximum engine revs, the blades working at the angle of attack for best L/D.

But, on cruising flight, there is an important inflow at the plane of the prop disk, that inflow reduces the angle of attack, and –under those conditions– the propeller can deliver enough thrust at maximum engine revs (i.e., with the blades working at the angle of attack for best L/D) only if the pitch is substantially higher than at takeoff...

That's the rationale of the adjustable prop...


It's not just the operating RPM that is pertinent. It's also the pitch of the blades.

If your propeller blades' pitch is optimized for takeoff/climb performance, it's going to be aerodynamically inefficient at high true airspeeds, like taking little tiny footsteps on a treadmill that's going really fast. (It works, but it wastes energy.)

The opposite is true as well. If you have a "cruise" prop on your airplane, it's going to perform poorly on takeoff when the airspeed is slow, like taking large strides on a treadmill that's just barely moving.

If you want to optimize your body mechanics, you change your gait based on the speed you need to go, so you're not wasting energy. If you want optimize a propeller, you change it's pitch based on the speed of the air that's entering it, so you're not wasting energy.

  • $\begingroup$ essentially using the blade at too high(stalled) or too low angle of attack. $\endgroup$ Oct 10 '20 at 15:23

Next to the aerodynamic advantages (both engine and propeller can run at their optimum speed for best efficiency) already mentioned in the other answers, there is an important safety advantage: a variable pitch propeller can be feathered such that its drag after an engine failure is minimized. This is critical for many multi-engine aircraft in order to remain controllable after an engine failure.

On many variable pitch propellers, the blade pitch can be increased to the point that the chord line of the blade is approximately parallel to the on-coming airflow. This process is referred to as feathering.

The inflight feathering of the propeller, on an engine that has failed or has been intentionally shut down, greatly reduces the drag that would occur with the blade pitch in any other position. On a single engine aircraft such as a motor glider, feathering the propeller when the engine is shut down results in a significant increase in gliding distance. On a multi-engine aircraft, feathering the propeller of a failed engine results in both a reduction in drag and a reduction in adverse yaw vastly improving the engine-out handling characteristics and the engine-out flight performance of the aircraft.

(SKYbrary - Feathering)

See also: What does feathering mean and how does it work technically?


Propellers get more effective the faster they spin. The limiting factor is the speed of the blade tip, which must remain subsonic. So a propeller of a given size will offer maximum thrust when its RPM gives a blade tip speed of around Mach 0.8.

Maximum thrust is needed especially for takeoff and for maximum speed. When the plane is stationary on the ground the prop spins wholly sideways, but when at speed it has to follow a much more angled spiral path through the oncoming air. These varying conditions can only be met by varying the blade pitch.

  • $\begingroup$ Effective and efficient are not the same. Propellers do become more effective the faster they spin (until the tips reach the critical Mach number), but they are most efficient at some optimal blade angle of attack (just like all airfoils). It is more efficient to reduce the prop RPM when less power is needed for cruise. $\endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Oct 10 '20 at 8:43
  • $\begingroup$ Point taken. I have edited my answer accordingly. $\endgroup$ Oct 10 '20 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ So there is another advantage - one can choose between max effectivity and max efficiency modes. $\endgroup$
    – Crowley
    Oct 10 '20 at 21:49

Reverse Pitch - Reverse Thrust

If the pitch angle is negative (reverse), then some meaningful amount of thrust is produced in the opposite direction than normal. This can be useful to improve stopping distance when landing, and even taxi in reverse. https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Reverse_Pitch#:~:text=When%20installed%2C%20reverse%20pitch%20is,of%20motion%20of%20the%20aircraft.

Zero Pitch - Idling

At somewhere around a pitch angle of zero, the net thrust becomes zero (forward or reverse). At this point the aerodynamic load on the prop is minimized. This removes unwanted thrust when we want to stand still on the runway, as well as minimizes fuel consumption during idle.

  • $\begingroup$ A transmission could do both of those, too. $\endgroup$
    – Bergi
    Oct 10 '20 at 22:51

propeller efficiency with pitch

Propeller efficiency with pitch, taken from Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators, H.H.Hurt, 1965

Fixed pitch props need to be designed for a specific flight speed, which would invariably be a compromise between takeoff and cruise performance. By varying the propeller pitch, we can run the propeller blades at different angles of attack, and we slow the blade tips down to keep their relative speed (sum of freestream and tangential speeds) constant. Thus, we can run the propeller at a similar efficiency through all flight speeds.

Running the blades at certain angles of attack is not as simple as it sounds, with different tangential speeds along the radius of the propeller, the freestream and tangential speeds will yield different flow angles (highest at the hub, least at the tip). To achieve the same angle of attack everywhere along the blade, we'll then need to twist the blade, but as we cannot change the twist in flight, we can optimize only for one flight condition, and be content with a compromise.

blade twist

Propeller blade twist. Prop's feathered in this picture, prop turns counterclockwise from the pilot's perspective (this blade moves down).

Another aspect is related to the performance of the engine. Reciprocating (piston) engines only recently had electronic fuel injection systems, thus most aero engines are reliant on having a throttle that restricts airflow to the engine to adjust power. To run the engine at part-power with a throttle is quite inefficient, as the engine actively spends power to suck air through the throttle (This is why newer auto engines have variable valve timing and cylinder shut-off and whatnot, to adjust engine power without choking it). By running the engine at an RPM lower than where it produces maximum power, we can run the engine at a higher throttle setting (ideally full throttle) with the same power.

Porsche 930 dyno graph

Porsche 930 dyno graph. Increasing blade pitch reduces RPM and moves the power (red graph) to the left of the graph, meaning less power at full throttle.

Porsche 930's engine was used as an aero engine by Mooney, with a 0.442:1 reduction gear.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.