1
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to upgrade old Mirage-III and Mirage-V variants with thrust-vectoring engines so that they can match the maneuverability of F-16s?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Adding thrust vectoring to arbitrary airplanes is pretty much like adding rear wheel steering to arbitrary motor vehicles. Yes you get super maneuverability but more often it's just unstable and dangerous. $\endgroup$ Jul 12, 2020 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ The simplest answer is NO. F-16s were designed and developed with such requirements. Whereas Mirages were never intended to do such manoeuvres. Even if you do so, you would end up compromising on the structural rigidity of the aircraft, which is already old by few decades. $\endgroup$
    – user46196
    Jul 12, 2020 at 6:45

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Given enough tinkering, it is technically possible. But so many other modifications would be needed - strengthening, wing revisions to maintain the relationship between centers of lift and gravity, trim authority, managing the changes in stability, never mind the engine mounting and avionics refit, etc. etc. that really you would just be cannibalizing an old airframe to make an entirely new plane.

Somebody might conceivably do it as a short-life proof-of-concept prototype, if a new plane were proposed, the Mirage airframe was a good enough match, and a sophisticated digital control system was not necessary for these early tests. But in practice there is nobody in the world with all of the need, the industrial capability, the Mirages and the budget to embark on a new fighter programme that would require such a prototype.

Dassault did experiment with adding separate lift engines in the fuselage, in the Balzac V (which was just such a hacked-about Mirage III airframe) and the Mirage IIIV (which was twice the size), but it all went nowhere.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .