First of all, is it permitted? I am practicing VOR tracking on my simulator and the missed approach procedure (KLGB VOR 30) takes you out to an intersection off two VOR radials. Since the plate doesn't specify "DME required" I figured yes.

Assuming yes, are there any tricks/protips to doing this successfully?

  • $\begingroup$ Is there a reference to something that specifically disallows cross-tuning for a holding fix? $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jun 14, 2020 at 23:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I know it was allowed at one time. I remember a documentary of a crash that occurred in the 70s or 80s. The narrator mentioned that the plane only had one working VOR receiver, so the copilot was distracted by the need to constantly switch frequencies to maintain their hold, and that this was legal. I don't know if they've changed the rules since then or not, and I can't even find the documentary anywhere. $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2020 at 0:01
  • $\begingroup$ @HiddenWindshield That's my recollection as well (legal at one time), and why I upvoted the question. I vaguely remember a statement about you can crosstune up until the FAF, but not past it. Not something I'd relish having to do in the weather, but legal at the time. Hopefully we get a definitive answer to this for today's rules. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jun 15, 2020 at 4:04

3 Answers 3


As I understand it you are asking two questions:

  1. is it permitted to hold at an intersection of two VOR radials with nothing more than a single VOR receiver? and
  2. what are some tips and tricks for doing it?

Answer to question one:

As others have mentioned, it was permitted at one time (and I believe it is still permitted). I'm old enough to have received training on how to do it at a time where it was much more common to fly in GA aircraft with no DME or GPS and sometimes only a single VOR receiver. I spent over an hour researching this question for you in the AIM, Airplane Flying Handbook, Instrument Flying Handbook, and Instrument Procedures Handbook, and online generally, and was not able to find anything saying it was permitted or prohibited. I don't see any problem with it other than it adds a bit of workload to the pilot, but it can be done safely and relatively easily. If I find an definitive answer I'll update my question.

Answer to question two:

Here are some tips and tricks for flying an intersection hold with nothing but a single VOR receiver. This explanation assumes you know how to hold, including the FAA recommended hold entries.

There are two radials, hence the intersection. I'm going to refer to them here as the main radial and the cross radial. (It is possible to approach the fix on the cross radial then switch to the main radial for the hold after executing the hold entry, however, for purposes of this explanation, I'm going to assume that you are approaching the fix on the main radial (i.e. the radial on which the inbound holding course is located).

In the figure below the aircraft is on the main radial and is approaching the cross radial from the West. However, this aircraft could also be approaching from the opposite side of the fix from the East. enter image description here

So, while you are on the main radial flying towards the fix, you want to spend most of your time monitoring the main radial because it is your primary course navigation, however, you also want to initially tune the cross radial well before reaching it in order to verify, and take a mental note of which side the CDI is deflected. This can be confusing to some pilots because the CDI will be either on the right or the left depending on where the station of the cross radial is located in relation the main radial. (When you fly a G1000 or HSI, the CDI rotates such that it is easy to tell when you are approaching the cross radial or have already passed it, but this is not the case in stand-alone old-school VORs). Whether the CDI of the cross radial is on the left or right also depends on if the pilot tuned in the radial or the reciprocal. For simplicity in this example, lets assume you tune in the cross radial well before reaching the intersection and the CDI is fully deflected to the left.

You then re-tune the main radial (hopefully your NAV radio has a flip-flop button), and center the CDI. You want to be as precise as possible and note the wind correction angle required and bug that heading! It's important to be precise, because you will be flying the bugged heading when you switch to the cross radial.

As you fly towards the holding fix on the main radial you will periodically switch back and forth to the cross radial until you detect the CDI is alive. At this point, you want to watch the CDI to get an idea of how fast it's moving. I like to take a note of the deflection of the CDI, lets say it is 8 degrees to the left (still haven't reached it), then take a note of the clock to determine how long it takes to fly 1 degree. Let's say that it takes 30 seconds to go from 8 degrees to 7 degrees, if so, then you know you have approximately 3.5 minutes before reaching the holding fix (7 degrees x 30 sec/deg = 210 sec or 3.5 min). You can then switch back to the main radial and continue navigating on it, until about 1 minute before you reach the intersection, at which point you would tune in the cross radial and fly your bugged heading until the cross radial is centered. At which point you would peform the appropriate hold entry.

At the moment you reach the holding fix, you will be flying the bugged heading and the cross radial will be tuned into your VOR. If you are on the main radial on the inbound heading, then it will be a direct entry and you just turn (right turn in the above figure) and fly outbound. On the outbound leg, tune the VOR to the main radial to the inbound course so that you can intercept it when you turn inbound. If you are approaching the holding fix from the opposite direction (from the East in the above figure) such that you are flying the outbound heading of the hold, then you will need to do a teardrop or parallel entry. In this case, I like to do the parallel entry because it requires less math and turning. Since you are already flying the outbound heading and are parallel to the inbound course you don't have to do anything when you reach the holding fix from this direction other than start the timer or take a note of the time and fly out for 1 minute. During this one minute of flying outbound on the parallel entry, you will tune in the main radial to the inbound course, so that when you make your greater than 180 degree turn you can intercept the inbound course.

Whether you do the direct entry or parallel entry, once you are established on the inbound course and tuned into the main radial, you will need to bug in that heading, and promptly tune the VOR to the cross radial, because you've only got a minute or so on the inbound leg to intercept the inbound course, determine the WCA, bug it, then tune the cross radial to identify reaching the holding fix.

Then repeat until you're ready to leave the hold.

This was a long explanation, but it's really not as bad as it sounds. When you are practicing this on the sim, you can try flying 2 minute legs, which gives you more time to intercept inbound, then tune the cross radial. As you get more efficient, you can shorten the legs until you get to 1 min. BTW, in actual IFR, you can ask ATC for a non-standard leg length. I imagine any airplane in this day an age with no DME or GPS that only has a single VOR is probably a very very slow airplane, and ATC can probably accomodate 2 or 3+ minute legs, just ask.


There are no regulations that I am aware of requiring that more than one VOR receiver is required when holding at a fix (unless specifically specified, which I have never seen for an enroute holding fix). The fundamental requirement is that when holding, a pilot is expected to remain within the protected airspace. Remaining in the holding pattern protected airspace is the reason there are airspeed limitations based on the altitude you are holding at (unless otherwise stated or published). Also, as noted in the Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM), there are also recommended entry procedures developed to assist the pilot in entering the holding pattern and remaining within the designed protected airspace.

As noted below in the Tullahoma VOR Rwy 6 approach (shown below), if you want to use the lowest minimums, dual VOR receivers are required. Apparently, the determination was made that in order to remain precisely within the protected airspace for the approach (using the lower miminums - smaller protected airspace) a second VOR receiver was necessary to avoid any unintentional drift outside the (narrow) protected airspace while switching back and forth between VOR frequencies and the applicable radials.

As for a technique to use a single VOR receiver to identify and hold at an enroute fix, there are many. In my opinion, it is primarily necessary to focus on the heading necessary to hold the course you are using while approaching the fix and calculate the wind direction and speed and then use that knowledge to adjust your heading while entering and turning in the hold. Verifying the accuracy of your wind direction/speed (and ultimate heading you choose depending on where you are in the holding pattern) is made by switching the VOR frequency and radial at appropriate times (e.g., wings level, lower workload position in the hold) and adjust as necessary.

Lastly, there are probably many different recommendations from pilots who read this post as to how best to use a single VOR receiver for holding. The above is just my opinion.

enter image description here


Yes, you can hold at an intersection with only the radial from one VOR identifying the intersection as long as you have either DME or GPS. And yes, you can hold at an intersection without DME or GPS if you have the intersection identified by the radials of two VORs. You can even hold with nothing but a GPS alone.

If you want to hold at a non-published hold position of your choosing, you could do so at a specific distance and direction from any identifiable point along a specific bearing from your hold fix. You can substitute the distance with the bearing from a second identifiable point. This includes NDBs, airports, Visual Reference Points, GPS waypoints, etc.

I always find it easiest to track inbound to the fix using either a radial, bearing, or GPS direct-to to the fix. When using VOR and DME, it is easiest to intercept the identifying radial way prior to reaching the appropriate distance. If you are using two VORs to identify the hold fix, intercept one of the identifying radials using one of your OBSs first. Use your other OBS to identify your second radial. Which OBS you choose depends on the radial or bearing of the fix along which you will be holding. That should be your primary OBS.

One of the holds given to me by the DPE on my instrument checkride was an unpublished hold at a self-declared, unofficial waypoint/fix. Since, I was on an IFR flight plan, I had to request the hold from ATC with the following format.

Skyhawkxxxxx, requesting a hold xx direction on a ### bearing, ## nautical miles and XX direction from intersection xxxxx, along the ### radial of xxxVOR, 1 minute legs, standard turn, at #### feet.

Admittedly, this was a bit of an over the top scenario given by the DPE. He was a legacy carrier captain who believed in making sure he tested beyond the capabilities of the magenta-line generation. It was more of a test of how I could think through, draw out , and communicate the hold while maintaining directional control under the hood rather than how to fly it. The bearing from the fix put me right in line with the IAF of my first IAP that had a hold-in-leau of procedure turn anyway.

  • $\begingroup$ Along with the info about all the things one can do in scenarios that are NOT asked about, does this answer actually give a "yes" or "no" answer to the stated "single receiver" (presumably without any other equipment like ADF, DME, or GPS) question? $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jun 14, 2020 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ @RalphJ - Actually, yes. The first paragraph answers the question of “Is it allowed and possible to hold at the intersection of two VOR radials using a single VOR receiver?“, as edited by Pondlife, with a Yes. It also answers the question “Is it possible to hold at an intersection with one VOR?“ as originally posted with a Yes. The third paragraph answers the question “Assuming yes, are there any tricks/protips to doing this successfully?“ $\endgroup$
    – Dean F.
    Jun 15, 2020 at 12:56
  • $\begingroup$ @RalphJ - If the OP’s question is specifically whether you are allowed to identify the holding fix using only one operational VOR receiver and one operational OBS display, the answer is still yes. Just as long as you have either a way to know distance, or there is a crossing VOR radial from another VOR transmitter. Flip-flopping VOR frequencies and radials is not the preferred method of doing this (especially IMC). But, there are still a lot of planes flying with only one NavCom radio (C150/2, many LSAs, etc). Just establish yourself on the hold’s inbound radial first before cross-referencing. $\endgroup$
    – Dean F.
    Jun 15, 2020 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ I fully understand HOW one would do it; the interesting question is, is such an operation permitted with the single receiver + no GPS, DME, or other navigation receivers. And, ideally, a link to something authoritative stating that it is (or isn't) permitted to identify a holding fix in this manner. Not just "yes you can" but "yes you may, per {this reference}". $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Jun 15, 2020 at 19:23
  • $\begingroup$ @RalphJ - Both the AIM 5-4-5 and the Instrument Flying Handbook both contain similar verbiage: “More than one navigation system separated by a slant indicates that more than one type of equipment must be used to execute the final approach (for example, VOR/DME RWY 31). More than one navigation system separated by the word“or”indicates either type of equipment can be used to execute the final approach (for example, VOR or GPS RWY 15).” I am unable to find an IAP labeled VOR/VOR at this time. $\endgroup$
    – Dean F.
    Jun 15, 2020 at 19:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .