I am trying to determine the length required for us to build a simple paved runway for a Cessna Grand Caravan EX Amphibian to depart for water landings and and return (VFR/VMC only, Part 135).

Previous questions about for "runway length required" only refer to Part 135 and Part 91 for Large Transport Category.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Why don't you just ask the owners/operators of the airplanes you are building the runway for? $\endgroup$ Apr 13 '20 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ P.S. I have performance charts for the wheeled 208 Caravan, if you needed a specific zero wind landing distance, or takeoff and distance needed to clear a 50 obstacle at a given weight, I could give you a number. But you'd still need to figure out what kind of safety margin you desire. I think the answer is probably too complex for this forum, but I can tell you that the wheeled Caravans I fly regularly service a 2900' sea level airfield at max weights without issue. Bigger is always better though, how much space do you have? $\endgroup$ Apr 13 '20 at 16:45

The minimum required runway length for a Cessna Caravan is *762m/2500ft. Considering that the Caravan has a stall speed of 60 knots, and for a safety margin, you would approach at 70 knots, this makes sense. Assuming that it slows at a rate of around 1 knot/ 10m, You can do some basic calculations: 70/1, which is 70, resulting in a 700m long runway, plus 62m for a safety margin.

EDIT: But now we're talking about amphibious, so water could help the plane slow down, but at the same time a longer takeoff roll would be required. And it turned out that the website I used wasn't reliable. Sorry about that. Anyways, it is said that an amphibious Cessna Caravan needs a takeoff roll of 2,341 feet/714m. However, the actual requirements force a 3660ft/1116m runway. I didn't get the landing distance required, but I think it's safe to say that the landing would be shorter than the takeoff roll.

*the actual runway length required of a normal caravan is 2,055 feet/ 626m, and you can expect to rotate at 1,160 ft/ 354m.

*Some (incorrect) information was from: http://www.sgl.com/208.html
And more correct info from: https://cessna.txtav.com/en/turboprop/caravan

Please tell me if I should delete the first paragraph.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This seems a little high compared to a C208 POH, which gives 1,795' over a 50' obstacle. I don't know how amphib gear changes the numbers though. $\endgroup$
    – Pondlife
    Apr 14 '20 at 4:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ -1 because this relies on several inappropriate assumptions. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '20 at 11:51
  • $\begingroup$ @pericynthion: none of my assumptions should be deemed appropriate, but I did forget he was talking about amphibious Caravans, not just Cessna Caravans in general. But I'm still pretty sure someone edited it to amphibious, because I didn't remember that being there. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '20 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ @pericynthion: pls remove the downvote if I made the correct corrections, and tell me exactly where I went wrong so I can improve. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '20 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Pondlife: That seems to be very odd. I don't know why a POH would have such a dramatic difference, but it is smaller. That still doesn't explain why the stall speeds are the same. Very odd. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '20 at 14:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.