Keeping thrust, wing span, weight (of plane) constant, can we increase the payload capacity (nearly 50% more)? Adding payload to plane, it decreases thrust/weight ratio, how does it affect the control over plane?

  • $\begingroup$ You can generally drain some fuel out of the tanks and still have useable range but recoup the fuel weight as payload capacity. $\endgroup$ – Dave Mar 28 '20 at 7:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Are you asking about how to improve the general design, or how to improve a given airplane standing in front of you? $\endgroup$ – Guy Inchbald Mar 28 '20 at 9:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How to improve the plane standing front of you , keeping thrust , wingspan and weight of plane same. I can change wing area , airfoil shape , fuselage or something else. This is a conceptual question. Not the practical one. $\endgroup$ – Skyspy Mar 28 '20 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ If you need to keep the airplane weight the same, I do not see how a 50% payload increase is realistic unless the initial payload was minuscule in both mass and volume. If weight is constant, no change in control is to be expected. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Mar 28 '20 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ You can increase the wing area and airfoil shape by dropping the flaps. $\endgroup$ – Michael Hall Mar 29 '20 at 1:34

I'm not sure what you mean by 'payload capacity'. Airplanes have what's termed a 'useful load' which is the maximum combined weight of the passengers, baggage and cargo, and useable fuel.

If you wanted to increase useful load, you would have to make the airframe and all systems aboard the airplane which constitute useful load lighter. This does have the adverse effect of making the structure weaker, lighter engines generally are less powerful so you have less thrust, and removal of mission systems reduces aircraft capability. Manufacturers strive to address these things and improve them over time with more rigid aluminum alloys or composites for increased strength to weight ratio, higher thrust to weight ratio engines with better fuel efficiency and lighter mission systems.

How an increase in weight affects aircraft performance not only depends on how heavy the airplane is but where the center of ends up being located. On a conventional airplane a forward CG produces better stability but requires more lift from the wings, resulting in decreased performance. An airplane with a more aft CG offers better performance, but is more unstable, particularly during high alpha operations such as slow flight. The maximum takeoff weight of the airplane was established during preliminary design studies and verified during flight testing so that it cannot exceed the load limits of the airframe and offer the required performance over a wide range of potential operating conditions.

Aircraft are, on occasion, approved via a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC), to increase their useful load, if the OEM or third party vendor can demonstrate that the mod can still operate safely and fulfill the regulatory requirements.

At any rate, the heavier the airplane is, the more lift it needs to fly, which means more drag, which means more thrust, which means greater fuel burn. This is why the airlines are so miserly in issuing out the bare minimum gas to meet federal Part 121 and company SOP requirements for their flights. The fuel saved doing this saves the company millions of dollars annually.


I'm assuming this is for something like the BMFA Payload Challenge where you design a model plane to carry a payload.

You need to increase the wing area, as lift is a function of wing area and speed (and speed requires power, so you can't increase it).

As your span is limited, you can add chord, or add another wing (i.e. turn it into a biplane).

More lift will create more induced drag, and as your power is constant, the result will be a lower flying speed, so you might need more than a 50% increase in area to generate 50% more lift.

how does it affect the control over plane ?

When you're flying slower, the wind has more effect. Also your control surfaces will generate less force, so your controls will feel less responsive.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.