2
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

This is a computational fluid dynamics simulation of an airfoil that is oriented to look like a vertical stabilizer. After watching the video, it becomes clear that the tip of the stabilizer causes a counter-clockwise vortex (if looking at the trailing edge). According to this answer, vortices only form on vertical stabilizers if a control surface (the rudder) is deflected. In this simulation, the rudder appears to be completely in-line with the rest of the airfoil.

Furthermore, there also appears to be a slight clockwise rotation on the bottom of the stabilizer, where it would attach to the aircraft's tail. This seems even harder to explain, given the opposite rotation and angular velocity of the top one. I can only assume this is partially caused by the disturbances from what look like hinges farther up. Is this reasonable?

TL;DR: What causes the strong vortex on the tip of this vertical stabilizer?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How can you be sure there's no sideslip? $\endgroup$ – JZYL Feb 29 at 3:51
  • $\begingroup$ @JZYL I personally see no disturbance that indicates any kind of slip $\endgroup$ – Pheric Feb 29 at 4:12
  • $\begingroup$ The vortices you ask about are in fact the very "disturbance" that you cannot see for looking. If you rotate the image clockwise a quarter-turn (or turn your head the other way), you appear to be looking down on a wing from above and everything becomes much more obvious. $\endgroup$ – Guy Inchbald Feb 29 at 10:05
3
$\begingroup$

The subtitle of the video states:

This video shows a high-fidelity CFD simulation of flow control applied to realistic wing profiles using PHASTA and ParaView Catalyst. Work done by Michel Rasquin from Argonne and Ken Jansen from UC Boulder.

Realistic wing profiles sounds like: we're actually looking at a wing in a vertical orientation - or in a horizontal orientation from a viewpoint that causes some confusion. Looking at a wing at some Angle of Attack that creates lift, and therefore the visualised flow pattern. And then the two vortices are caused by the end effect of finite wing span.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Agreed. If the description says it is an airfoil then it is one and behaves like one. Changing the orientation does not transform it to a stabilizer. $\endgroup$ – Ville Niemi Feb 29 at 8:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.