5
$\begingroup$

I've read that the tailplane produces negative lift, so does that mean it would function like an inverted wing (has negative camber)? The image below is the best illustration I could come up with.

enter image description here

Also, is negative lift and tail down force the same thing?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think symmetric airfoil also exists for the tailplane (as they do exist for wing, mainly on aerobatic). It may differ depending on the aircraft, maybe restricting your question to some aircraft type could be useful $\endgroup$
    – Manu H
    Feb 6, 2020 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ Well, when you pull the elevator will sure create a negative camber $\endgroup$ Feb 6, 2020 at 16:14

4 Answers 4

6
$\begingroup$

The tailplane should produce less lift than the main wing, for pitch stability. That is to say, its lift is negative relative to the wing lift. Its lift need not be wholly negative (pointing down), although it usually is during takeoff and landing.

But yes, as a first approximation, the direction of camber matches the direction of lift.

Also yes, negative lift (at the tail or anywhere else) can be called downforce (at the tail or anywhere else).

Here is Peter's explanation.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Most tailplanes (except for specialist applications, like endurance designs in model airplanes) have a symmetrical airfoil, whether thickened or effectively a flat plate. Camber of any sort is unusual in tailplanes for full size aircraft -- except as it might be incidentally produced by elevator trim, and in that case, it might be either upward or downward, depending on the trim requirement at any given speed and CG location.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Are the trim tabs cambered/symmetric? $\endgroup$
    – Johnson
    Feb 6, 2020 at 17:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd expect trim tabs to continue the same contour as the tailplane in general, so either flat plate sections with rounded/tapered trailing edge, or tapered to match the symmetrical airfoil of the tailplane. $\endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    Feb 6, 2020 at 17:09
5
$\begingroup$

Indeed, the airfoils on many horizontal tail surfaces do have negative camber. This is mostly in combination with powerful flaps on the wing so the tailplane will continue to work with flaps extended, when it needs to develop a relatively high downforce (which is indeed the same as negative lift). The extended wing flaps result in higher wing downwash so the tail "sees" a more negative angle of attack. By cambering the tail airfoil, it will tolerate more negative angles of attack and its minimum lift coefficient is lower than that of a symmetrical airfoil.

Do-228 NG tailplane

I know it is hard to see, but this Do-228 tailplane really does have negative camber (picture source).

PZL Wilga tail

The PZL Wilga has a symmetrical tail airfoil but uses an inverted, fixed slat at the leading edge of its elevator (picture source).

A380 tail

The A380 uses negative camber at the root of the tail, too, like most airliners (picture source). To keep isobars aligned with chord lines in a swept wing is also a reason for negative camber at the root.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

A few constructions, such as the Zenith CH 701 STOL, have horizontal stabs with non-symmetric, inverted airfoils:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .