3
$\begingroup$

The title says it all. It can be clearly seen, for example, in this image:

SU-34
(image source: Wikimedia)

The rest of the jet seems to have a camouflage.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Tips of the vertical stabs are also white... $\endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    Oct 16 '19 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ Related $\endgroup$ Sep 11 '21 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Rodrigo, Now we should probably mark this question a dup of that newer one, because it has a good answer, and the answers are the same for both, and the accepted answer for this Q is incorrect. $\endgroup$
    – Zeus
    Sep 13 '21 at 0:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Zeus I would wait a few weeks before making this a duplicate. $\endgroup$ Sep 13 '21 at 8:38
  • $\begingroup$ @RonBeyer: Stabs tips are white because they are also radomes hosting VHF antennas (3D blueprint). $\endgroup$
    – mins
    Sep 18 '21 at 18:46
3
$\begingroup$

It is all part of the camouflage.

The blue parts on the bottom make the aircraft hard to identify from below against a blue-background (sky). The dark parts on the top make it difficult to identify from above against a dark background (ground).

The white parts make the aircraft's size/shape difficult to determine. This helps to confuse the enemy by making the aircraft seem farther away than it really is.

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would think more of a "fade" from grey to white, than a sharp line, would be much better, even if the fade is only over say 6 to 12 inches or so. $\endgroup$ Oct 16 '19 at 18:18
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ ausairpower.net/Su-34-Fullback/… I have seen photos of SU-34s with grey radomes and matching vert stab tips. I am not convinced that a bright white radome is considered a form of camouflage. I would like to see some sort of reference to back it up. $\endgroup$ Oct 16 '19 at 19:57
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I'm with Mike Sowsun. In fact, highlighting the nose and tail like this would provide a clear reference point that could actually aid one in estimating range. Maybe this is a training or aggressor version? $\endgroup$ Oct 16 '19 at 21:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am starting to think the radomes are actually “radio transparent” grey or white as per this modelling website: internethobbies.com/products/… $\endgroup$ Oct 17 '19 at 1:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that the cover of the rear-facing radar is NOT white.. $\endgroup$
    – juzzlin
    Sep 17 '21 at 6:28
1
$\begingroup$

They're white because that's the cove of the radar dome(Radome) by being white, they reflect em interference and thermal suns rays to keep radar clutter to a minimum

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ I assume the same. Like the black noses of older passenger planes. $\endgroup$
    – Peter
    Sep 16 '21 at 6:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The color has nothing to do with whether or not it reflects EM (electro magnetic) interference [signals]. White does reflect solar radiation, which can help reduce sun loading (heating) on the antenna and other electronics behind the radome. $\endgroup$
    – SteveSh
    Sep 16 '21 at 11:39
  • $\begingroup$ How about the vertical stabs then? Also, the cover of the rear-facing radar is NOT white.. $\endgroup$
    – juzzlin
    Sep 17 '21 at 6:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Because they protect sensitive instruments while allowing electronic signals to pass through, nose cones – also known as radomes – must be made from specific materials. These materials often include fiberglass, quartz, honeycomb and foam cores; as well as various chemical resins $\endgroup$
    – LazyReader
    Sep 17 '21 at 8:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @juzzlin - Because there's probably an antenna of some sort on top of the stabilizers. $\endgroup$
    – SteveSh
    Sep 17 '21 at 20:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.