3
$\begingroup$

Airfoil which air is deflected up of the leading edge's tip

I have difficulties to understand this air phenomenon, why the air from below the leading edge's tip (from below the horizontal line) is deflected up and not just follow the bottom wing's surface? What is the physics explanation of it?

| improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You may understand air molecules travel in all directions and what you see is the trajectory of small particules. This trajectory is the result of air particule hitting this particule, i.e. an average o a small volume if air around this particule. $\endgroup$ – Manu H Oct 12 '19 at 15:39
5
$\begingroup$

The short answer is: because not all of the incoming air can fit under the airfoil, so some of it gets pushed up and above the leading edge. This air could also fit under the airfoil by other means like becoming denser (compressing), but that requires more energy, so it mostly flows around.

In your image, the effect is exaggerated by the closeness of the ground, which places the entire airfoil in ground effect. In normal flight conditions, without the ground blocking it, more air would be able to flow underneath the airfoil.


The longer answer has to do with the speed of sound, which is the speed at which pressure waves propagate through a fluid. If the free stream is subsonic, pressure waves generated by an object can flow upstream and alter the flow ahead of any disturbance.

This is exactly what is happening here: the airfoil is affecting the pressure field, specifically by creating an area of high pressure underneath. This affects the incoming flow, deflecting it upwards ahead of the airfoil.

If this experiment were performed in supersonic conditions, you would not see any disturbance in the incoming airflow until it hit the bow shock wave of the object, after which it would become locally subsonic and be abruptly deflected to flow around the airfoil.

| improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Pressure waves propagating through a fluid"? Perhaps, subsonicly, a mass of higher pressure (therefor denser) air forms under the pitched wing, which deflects incoming air. And let's not forget the lower pressure behind the wing, which also helps deflect the flow, and accelerate it, over the top of the wing (see complete smoke trail). $\endgroup$ – Robert DiGiovanni Oct 12 '19 at 7:15
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertDiGiovanni: At subsonic speeds variations in density are small. High pressure mostly means slow moving, not dense. Big changes in density are only possible in supersonic flow. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Oct 12 '19 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Peter Kampf its not an all or nothing rule, only greatly magnified at higher speeds (who can really fathom 550 mph?). Of interest is how the higher pressure (ok, not density) and lower pressure affects the air flow more than the form itself, although the form creates the highs and lows. $\endgroup$ – Robert DiGiovanni Oct 12 '19 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ The picture is from here, a video of spoiler of a car's testing. It is spoiler tunnel test with smoke. Hard to say that the below of the wing is "congested" or compressed. $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Oct 14 '19 at 9:48
  • $\begingroup$ @AirCraftLover hard to say, because car spoilers are mostly fashion accessories outside of high-performance competitions like F1. The tests in that video are at completely wrong Reynolds numbers, but they already show the main issue: the spoilers are immersed in detached flow from the car body, and thus very inefficient. But that is essentially a whole different question. $\endgroup$ – AEhere supports Monica Oct 14 '19 at 9:56
1
$\begingroup$

Simple answer: The plane that divides the air that goes below the airfoil from the air that goes above sits quite a bit below the leading edge.

There are several things to see here:

  1. Local speed: The closer and more focused the smoke lines are, the higher the local flow speed.
  2. Local pressure: Speed equals lower pressure, so the area of the closely packed smoke lines also indicates very low pressure. Bernoulli's law applies here (along one stream line).

This low pressure is sucking in air from all around, and that is what bends the smoke lines ahead of the airfoil up. Of course, pressure always means a pressure difference and this effect is magnified by the blocking of the flow near the trailing edge. As @AEhere correctly observes, ground effect creates a high pressure area ahead of the lower wing and along its length which pushes the smoke lines up. At the gap between trailing edge and ground the flow speeds up again, but unfortunately there are no smoke lines to illustrate this.

The diffuse smoke lines past the nose region show that the flow slows down there and turbulence mixes the smoke with more air. The flow separates at the nose where a wedge of stagnant air helps the smoke lines to move away from the airfoil contour. Pressure from above pushes the diffuse smoke down over the rear airfoil so the smoke past the trailing edge sits on top of the flow which manages to squeeze through between the trailing edge and the ground.

Without the ground effect the upwards bending of the smoke lines would look quite similar but more air from below would fill up the area behind the airfoil so the smoke would not move quite so much down.

Flow visualisation at a leading edge

Condensed water vapor from the nacelle vortex generator negotiating the leading edge of a Boeing 737 (picture source). Here the nacelle intensifies the effect, but the direction of the extended slats indicates that the local flow direction along the wing span does not differ that much from the flow visualized by the condensed water vapor.

Here the flow stays attached: Note that its distance from the wing contour is constant initially and only grows when the flow slows down, indicated by the widening of the water jet. In contrast to this, on the photo in your question the flow moves away from the wing while still moving fast, indicating flow separation.

| improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, nice slats on that photo, it would be great if the computers figured out how much slat should be dropped for a given weight to optimize the wing drag (I understand they even tilt the lift vector forward a bit). $\endgroup$ – Robert DiGiovanni Oct 12 '19 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ Will you please check this video? It is an wind tunnel test for varying AoA. In 5:44, it is clearly shown that the smoke is also deflected upward even with shallow AoA. The wind in the tunnel also is not high speed. $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Oct 14 '19 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ @AirCraftLover Now I wasted 8 mins watching this useless video. So what? $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Oct 14 '19 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for your time you wasted. :) $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Oct 14 '19 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ As per my understanding from the video, the smoke in the tunnel was not high speed close to sound speed. And it was not wet wind. It just smoke, which flows quite slow. As in the 5:44, it was still deflected upward the smoke even it was low speed and shallow AoA. Then my question was, "What is the explanation of this airfoil phenomenon so the air from below the leading edge's tip deflected upward, even the wind flowed quite slow and with shallow AoA?" I rewrite the question to make better. $\endgroup$ – AirCraft Lover Oct 14 '19 at 21:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.