4
$\begingroup$

New airplanes have to confirm that all passengers have to be evacuated within 90 seconds or they wouldn't be certified by aviation authorities. But where does the 90 seconds limit come from? Why isn't it 60 or 120 seconds? Is it based on a series of studies or is it just a nice round number that was chosen based on a rule of thumb?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

90 seconds comes from a safety aspect, specifically a fire safety aspect

Aviation Safety Study SA9501 Footnote 3 says:

Internationally, industry accepts 90 seconds as a reasonable estimate of the survivable time in an evacuation where fire is present.

Which means that it is predicted than a burning aircraft is not sustainable for life beyond that period, but interestingly this is not the condition that the aircraft is certified under.

FAA Chapter 77 Section 1.7 says:

A full-scale emergency evacuation demonstration simulates an aborted takeoff. The operator must show that the aircraft, emergency equipment, and emergency procedures allow the evacuation of the aircraft at full seating capacity, including crewmembers, in 90 seconds or less.

So the 90 second rule comes from a fire safety aspect - as humans are not expected to survive in those conditions for longer than that; but the aircraft is only tested on whether it can evacuate on an aborted takeoff (not specifying that a simulated fire must be the cause of this aborted takeoff).

Sources: https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2699.pdf

http://fsims.faa.gov/WDocs/8300.10%20Airworthiness%20Insp%20Handbk/Volume%202/2_077_00.htm

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sure, but why exactly is it 90 seconds? Who came up with this number and how? $\endgroup$ – JonathanReez Supports Monica Oct 7 at 19:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.