Is it to increase the air resistance of the aircraft?
Source: reddit.com
12
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
-
$\begingroup$ "Tool" meaning "device" or "apparatus"? $\endgroup$ – Harper - Reinstate Monica Sep 12 at 21:35
18
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
Those are airbrakes, they allow the aircraft to increase its drag substantially to bleed off excess energy. They are hydraulically operated, and need pressure for both deployment and retraction, i.e. they do not auto-stow, at least on this aircraft.
Airbrakes are a handy feature, especially for a ground attack aircraft like the Su-25 in your picture, as they help both with landing on short airstrips and with dive bombing, a tactic that requires to dive almost vertically on a target to minimize slant errors in targeting. This is made possible by the airbrake, which prevents the aircraft from exceeding its dive speed.
Other aircraft types use or have used airbrakes in the past, mainly to dissipate energy during an approach. Examples include some airliners, most fighters and nearly all gliders.
Fighters are usually optimized for high speeds which are dangerous to land at, and an airbrake enables them to quickly slow down while on final approach, remaining at a comfortable speed until the last moment. They also have some occasional uses in WVR (Within visual Range) combat, but this will be rabidly argued against by the BVR (Beyond Visual Range) and stealth cults.
Gliders also use airbrakes to control their speed on approach and when diving, but also to arrest undesired climbs, when caught in a thermal when they need to descend. Since typically gliders lack a hydraulic or even electric system, their airbrakes are actuated by the pilot's muscles and are more akin to spoilers.
The geometry of an airbrake can vary significantly, but the principle is the same: a large surface extended into the airstream that generates mostly drag. their location on the airframe is a compromise between structural, mechanical and control considerations, i.e., it needs to be strong enough to resist the loads, easy enough to route hydraulic lines or control rods to, and not significantly impact the aircraft's stability. The examples below are a BAe 146, an F-15, a Slingsby Capstan and a MiG-23:
answered Sep 12 at 7:05
-
$\begingroup$ I'd love to know why the Su-25 has such unique speedbrakes though. They appear to be parallel to the direction of travel, which seems odd for a brake. $\endgroup$ – zymhan Sep 13 at 17:41
-
1$\begingroup$ @zymhan It´s hard to find a good high-res picture online, but if you trust Trumpeter models to be accurate, you can see the geometry here; it is not parallel to the airflow at all. If I had to wager a guess about why it is there, it is likely the designers did not find enough space around the tailcone to deploy them out of the engine exhaust plume. $\endgroup$ – AEhere supports Monica Sep 13 at 19:34
-
1
