53
$\begingroup$

Is it possible for the pilot to feel passing through the sound barrier in an F-16?

What about other modern aircraft, will you feel anything? Do you need to go back to really dated designs before you can notice this, is it a problem of the past, or did the documentaries I watched which discussed this problem grossly exaggerate it?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ FWIW, the sound "barrier" is not so much a thing that an aircraft encounters in flight as it was an obstacle that aircraft designers faced before they fully understood the nature of supersonic flows, and learned how to build aircraft that were capable of controlled, supersonic flight. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 23, 2019 at 14:08

3 Answers 3

59
$\begingroup$

In an aircraft designed to go supersonic, it's an absolute non-event, and one is only aware of it by observing the instruments, and noting diminished control authority-- slower roll rate, etc. At least, that was my experience in the T-38, and according to every account I've read.

If the aircraft is NOT designed to go supersonic, then the experience can be quite different, although that mostly comes from loss of control at high Mach numbers (starting in the 0.9X range, as best I recall), rather than anything that occurs right at Mach 1.00.

$\endgroup$
11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I've heard of the P-38s going transonic in dives and not being able to recover until they can get into denser air. $\endgroup$
    – BillDOe
    Commented Aug 20, 2019 at 18:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Generally, the T-38 had an amazing roll rate, like over 360 degrees per second. Supersonic, though, it was way less, maybe a quarter or an eighth of that. Don't remember exactly when it dropped off; it was NOT a noticeable thing at Mach 1; you noticed a twitch in the airspeed & altitude indications, but only that. Then you try the aileron roll, and it seems to take forever. We didn't demo that at .90, .95, etc for comparison, unfortunately. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 2:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @BillDOe: There is no recorded case of the P-38 going faster than sound. There were problems in high speed dives that cause loss of control, but they were not caused by the P-38 breaking the sound barrier. There were P-38s that broke up in dives. The "bang" from the breakup was (falsely) interpreted as a sonic boom. $\endgroup$
    – JRE
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 11:40
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ @JRE He said transonic, not supersonic. The loss of control authority on P-38s in high speed dives was related to parts of the airflow around it becoming supersonic (but I agree definitely not the plane as a whole), see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_tuck $\endgroup$
    – llama
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 16:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Doesn't it get a little quieter in the cockpit at supersonic speeds? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 16:12
24
$\begingroup$

You can watch for yourself 4 minutes in on this video. Can't tell at all, so much so that they have to let people know with a big sign. Once the issues of buffeting during the transition were fixed in the design of supersonic aircraft, pretty anticlimactic.

$\endgroup$
1
6
$\begingroup$

In the F-18, you experienced a very slight "tuck", which was basically the nose of the aircraft pitching around the horizontal axis very slightly. But, it was extremely minor, and in order to notice it you needed to be in smooth air, and paying close attention.

In 99% of transitions through "the number", you were so focused on other stuff you noticed nothing.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Very interesting answer. Perhaps you could add the source for this? It seems implied that you either are or were an F/A-18 pilot, is this true? Or it this second hand information from someone else? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 25, 2019 at 14:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I am the source, so indeed it is hard. I flew F-18's for the Australian Air Force in a past life. $\endgroup$
    – RoryH
    Commented Aug 27, 2019 at 10:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your comment, and answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2019 at 19:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .