Often flights will leave the cruising altitude long before the actual landing. They will go down to a couple of thousand feet and stay at that altitude and circle for quite a while in waiting loops before it's actually their turn to land. It can be seen basically all the time at Heathrow Airport (LHR). But also for example in Munich Airport (MUC), where flights often come far down over the city and then make wide turns towards the airport.

So I'm wondering: if it's already clear ahead of time (and I'm sure mostly it is) that it's not their time to land yet, why not circle at higher altitudes? Often those waiting loops occur over dense populations and thus create quite some noise on the ground.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ A couple of thousand feet? The lowest level for Heathrow's stacks is 7000ft, and aircraft will enter higher than that. See Heathrow arrival paths $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2019 at 20:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It’s still an altitude at which you can clearly hear the planes on the ground $\endgroup$
    – silent
    Commented Aug 16, 2019 at 20:31
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ "creating quite some noise" Username checks out :) $\endgroup$
    – Bianfable
    Commented Aug 16, 2019 at 20:41
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ @silent Noise intensity falls off with the square of distance. An aircraft at 7000ft is already about one tenth as noisy as one at 'a couple of thousand feet'. Having lived near Biggin Hill for many years I can tell you that the traffic noise from the M25 was far more intrusive than the passing jets. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2019 at 20:46
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @sean We're not talking about traffic visiting the airfield, but traffic using the Biggin hold while en route to Heathrow. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2019 at 21:47

3 Answers 3


It's better to be low(-ish) and ready for a spot to open, than high and far from that spot. As to why, for busy international airports the answer is really simple:

► There isn't a way to manage it near perfectly (yet).

To understand that statement, requires some prerequisites, so I'll try to simplify and summarize the basics:

  1. There is the concertina effect: it's when fast vehicles slow down, the spacing between them go down. So the nearer the airport for landing, the more squeezing happens.

  2. Add to that that the arriving planes come from all or most directions, and the same low-ish airspace is being used by departures as well.

  3. The trajectory of each plane depends on each plane's load and performance, and the wind it experiences. While wind is forecast, the forecasts aren't perfect.

A solution to that is for all planes to send their estimated trajectories to the air traffic management (ATM). That is one of the projects being worked on in Europe, but it's at least a decade from full deployment. One part of it is the extended arrival management (E-AMAN).

Why wasn't it worked on decades ago has to do with the history of data communication in aviation. And it boils down to money and return of investment. Initially some of the users, like the airlines, didn't see a benefit of the high cost of the high tech solutions they'd have to add to their planes.

  1. Seasonal adverse weather en route or in the terminal area complicates matters even more.

  2. Busy international airports with multiple runways land planes every 30 seconds or so, so you can imagine the impact of the slightest delay one plane headed to that airport experiences. So arrival management is first come, first served.

Related: What are the negative associations with Continuous Descent Approach?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Perfectly managed" would be to slow down their cruise before reaching the destination if there was a landing backlog, and have planes (nearly) never circle in holding patterns? But still land 1 plane / 30 sec. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 13:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @PeterCordes: Sure, and to do that you need to know each plane's estimated trajectory, hence one of the paragraphs and the link. $\endgroup$
    – user14897
    Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 14:12

Airports can accept landing aircraft at a (mostly) fixed, constant rate. However, inbound aircraft arrive at different times and rates based on weather and other factors, regardless of the schedules. This means, at times, aircraft will be coming in faster than the airport can accept them, from many different directions. And airplanes can't just stop mid-air to wait their turn.

The answer is to put aircraft in a "holding pattern", which is a racetrack (not circle) shape that repeatedly passes over the same fixed point, to delay them. When you do this at multiple altitudes, it becomes a "holding stack".

Arriving aircraft are directed into the top of the stack, 1000ft above the previous one. Aircraft at the bottom of the stack are released at a fixed rate to continue toward the airport, and all the aircraft above them are shifted down 1000ft.

The depth of the stack will vary depending on numerous factors, but at congested airports like Heathrow, every arriving plane is pretty much guaranteed to do at least a few turns in holding. And yes, this can mean a lot of noise on the ground for those who live under the stacks. That is the price of airports not being able to expand to increase their arrival rate.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. However my question was more about why the holding pattern occurs on rather low altitudes. Why need often need to wait in line (or in stacks...) is clear to me $\endgroup$
    – silent
    Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 9:24
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @silent It depends how close the stack is to the airport. In general, the bottom of the stack will be how high airplanes should be if the stack isn't in use. The standard descent angle is 3° (about 1000ft per 1.5nmi), so if the bottom of the Heathrow stacks is at 7000ft, I'd expect them to be about 10nmi from the airport. $\endgroup$
    – StephenS
    Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 17:19

As an aside to the hold explanations furnished above: to save on fuel, an airliner will reduce power to commence descent at a distance from the airport which will place it at either 1) its anticipated hold altitude, or 2) the landing pattern entry altitude, subject to ATC's instructions, upon arrival in the vicinity of the airport.

While at reduced power, the pilot will trim the aircraft for the optimum power-on glide angle that lets him or her make best use of the plane's gravitational potential energy during the descent and approach, and thereby minimize fuel burn during that phase of the flight. The pilot will adjust this to conform to ATC instructions by adding power or deploying spoilers, flaps, or gear as required.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Useful information, but the question seems to be about holding patterns. $\endgroup$
    – David K
    Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 3:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ understand, will edit. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2019 at 6:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .