enter image description hereImage source

Some helicopters have a very complicated set-up that mixes flight control inputs to many or all of the swashplate actuators, like in the picture above for the S-76.

Why are all the cross-couplings required, would the helicopter not be controllable without the flight control mixing action? We only need to cant the swashplate for cyclic control, lift it for collective, and connect the pedals to the tail rotor, right?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand where this question is coming from, so I'm leaning toward the trivial answer "because helicopter flight dynamics are complicated and so is transmitting control inputs to a set of rotating wings". Could you expand the question further? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 5, 2019 at 8:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you are specifically referencing the image in your question, are you taking into account that most of the complexity comes form the optional servos? If you replace them with rods the entire assy. becomes much clearer. To be honest I can't read what connects to what in that resolution, but it does not seem to do anything out of the ordinary; the only mixing going on is collective input into both the forward and lateral actuators, which is expected, since it is easier to implement collective using the cyclic system already there. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01

3 Answers 3


Flight dynamics of a helicopter are complicated indeed. Just to illustrate, consider a helicopter in a stable hover, with the pilot holding the collective, cyclic and pedals in the position that maintains attitude, altitude and heading.

They now want to gain altitude only, in a climbing hover. The sequence of events:

  • Pilot pulls on the collective, all rotor blades increase angle of attack and the rotor creates more lift. The helicopter climbs.
  • But because the AoA of the blades have changed, the engine must apply more torque to the rotor and the heading starts to change. So the pilot must apply pedal to change tail rotor thrust and compensate for the torque.
  • The increased thrust of the tail rotor causes lateral drift. So the pilot needs to input lateral cyclic in order to compensate.

from an old paper photocopy

To gain a pure vertical climb, the pilot needs to carry out simultaneous deflections of three flight controls! This collective-to-yaw and collective-to-lateral coupling not only occurs in the hover, but also in forward flight. When increasing speed, the pilot needs to:

  • deflect cyclic pitch forward;
  • increase collective for the additional required power;
  • deflect the pedal for the increase in rotor thrust - but at speed, the vertical fin and the tail rotor take over most or all of this;
  • deflect the cyclic to the side to compensate for the increased tail rotor thrust, or for the sideslip from the vertical tail stabilisation.

For small, simple and low cost helicopters, this is indeed the way they are flown. But for larger helicopters with a mission, some of the cross couplings are taken care of by the mechanical mixer: when increasing collective, a mechanical link automatically increases the inputs for the cross couplings. It does so in series with the flight controls, which do not move and retain their former selected position.

enter image description here

The drawing in the OP is of at the S-76, a medium sized helicopter, and we can find the following:

  • Collective/Roll mixer (lateral lead). Provides automatic rotor sideways deflection as a function of collective stick deflection.
  • Pitch bias actuator. Extends as a function of airspeed, so that the cyclic pitch stays near centre, for more comfort at high speed.
  • An unlabelled connection rod between collective and pedals.
  • Collective/Pitch mixer. This helicopter will start to pick up speed when collective is deflected, for a straight-up vertical speed, the pilot will need to deflect the stick backwards.

Also in the OP drawing: optional AFCS servos, which reduce control forces and provide the static stability that helicopter aerodynamics do not provide. Plus trim actuators, which change the neutral position of the feel springs or completely eliminates feel forces. And a yaw damper.

Very complicated indeed.


Not sure if this should be an answer or comment. Not addressing "Mixing" but control system complexity. Many larger turbine helicopters have a system called Force Trim which is used to recenter the cyclic at different speeds. Without Force Trim the pilot would be holding extreme forward cyclic at high speed and extreme aft cyclic at low speeds. Also many models of helicopter have various linkages to minimize feedback from the rotor and control system to the cyclic. The pesky problem of "Stick-shake" can be largely mitigated by some form of irreversible linkage. Both of these systems add to control system complexity.


It's necessary to allow control by the relatively crude "pilot's brain" of an autopilot system, basically to help it out with all the cross-couple responses that are normally taken care of by a human with lots and lots of practice.

You can see that there are autopilot servos in the system, as required for IFR single pilot certification.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .