Sometimes in damp conditions I notice some surprising (surprising to me, anyway) behaviour of water.

I'll see moisture glistening in the heads of rivets or bolts on the top of the engine pylons - that stays there for a long time (many minutes) after take-off.

Similarly, at the front edge of my window I will see a pool of water that only very slowly diminishes, seeding little drops (that become smaller and smaller as airspeed increases). Again, this pool remains far longer than I'd expect.

I'm surprised because I'd expect the evaporative and sweeping effect of the high-speed airstream to clear this moisture extremely fast, and yet it doesn't.

I suppose that despite the speed of the airstream, there are numerous small areas on the surface of the plane that are sheltered from it very effectively.

I'm interested to know what the implications of the causes of this effect are are for aerodynamics, for example how they relate to drag on the fuselage, or - where it happens on lifting or control surfaces - how their operation is affected.

  • $\begingroup$ Consider observing your wing's leading edge while in flight and see what happens there. $\endgroup$
    – Criggie
    May 27, 2019 at 19:18
  • 13
    $\begingroup$ Sometimes the water is solid, which hopefully tells us something. $\endgroup$
    – Roger
    May 27, 2019 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ What evaporative effect? Air at 100% humidity does not evaporate anything at all. $\endgroup$ May 28, 2019 at 19:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The rivets and bolts are (thermally) connected to larger pieces of metal. $\endgroup$ May 29, 2019 at 13:57

4 Answers 4


This effect is likely caused by something called the "boundary layer," first defined by German engineer Ludwig Prandtl in a paper he presented in 1904 at the third International Congress of Mathematicians in Heidelberg, Germany. From Wikipedia:

The effect of the paper was so great that Prandtl became director of the Institute for Technical Physics at the University of Göttingen later in the year.

Over the next decades he developed it into a powerhouse of aerodynamics, leading the world until the end of World War II. In 1925 the university spun off his research arm to create the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Flow Research (now the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization).

The math in the paper is complicated and frankly well beyond my paygrade, but the way I understand it, what I think you are seeing is caused by a laminar boundary layer that forms very close to almost all surfaces of the aircraft. It is a layer of air with high viscosity, low turbulence, low speed relative to the air farther out from the surface, and causing an increase in drag. That's why the water doesn't blow away or evaporate.

The image below is one I found which does a good job of presenting the two types of boundary layer -- laminar and turbulent. Look at how smooth the laminar boundary layer looks compared to the turbulent boundary layer. This might help to understand the concept better.

enter image description here

The boundary layer is also something I experienced with an experimental aircraft I restored that had an opening on the top right of the fuselage to feed air into the fuel injection system intake. As it was, air would essentially stop flowing into the system when the aircraft accelerated, and the engine would stop. Not good. In order to stop that from happening, a raised scoop had to be installed that extended above the laminar boundary layer and into the turbulent boundary layer. That solved the problem.

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ The issue that you mention is why many aircraft air intake systems are separated from the fuselage. This is probably most clearly represented on the F16. $\endgroup$
    – dotancohen
    May 28, 2019 at 9:39
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Depending on where one is looking on the aircraft, the boundary layer is probably turbulent and not laminar. That said, it is still comparatively low speed even when turbulent, and there is a thin region on the order of a millimeter that is "laminar," even for turbulent BLs. A BL is also why insects walking on your car hood or windshield tend to stay around much longer than expected while you're driving around. It isn't confined to vehicles either -- the reason wind is only a few MPH at the surface while it's much, much faster at higher altitudes is due to the atmospheric boundary layer. $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    May 29, 2019 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, a laminar boundary layer will eventually become turbulent the farther back along the surface of the aircraft you look. I don't know the theory well enough, but clearly devices like wing fences and vortex generators are intended to break up that laminar boundary layer much earlier along the chord of the wing, for example. The explanation for this is for another question. :) $\endgroup$ May 29, 2019 at 12:10

The moisture stays at the surface because the air speed at the surface is essentially zero. (No-slip condition)

A solid body moving through a fluid develops a boundary layer around it, which is caused by friction between the surface and the air.

A boundary layer is a region of slow moving air relative to the body it surrounds. The closer you get to the surface, air velocity relative to the body decreases. This is why dust doesn't really blow off your car even when driving at highway speeds.

enter image description here

Source: http://img.tfd.com/mgh/cep/Typical-laminar-boundarylayer-velocity-profile.jpg

As to why the pool of water slowly diminishes - As the airspeed increases, the boundary layer becomes more turbulent which has higher shear stresses and higher rate of mixing within the layer.

The drops of water around the aircraft do change the shape of the surface locally, same with insects or icing which degrades performance (increased drag, forced transition to turbulence), but the effect is very small.

What does this behaviour of water on the aircraft skin tell us?

Not much really. It's hard to see clear water. Aerodynamicists use oil with dyes instead to visualize the airflow around the surface of the aircraft.

enter image description here

Source: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/122863896054044619/

Using this technique, they can spot regions of flow separation and reattachment, spanwise flow and more. This information helps them refine the aerodynamics of the plane.

Edit: fixed grammar + added pic

  • $\begingroup$ The profile is only good for a laminar boundary layer. Most aircraft boundary layers are turbulent as are basically all of the car boundary layers. $\endgroup$ May 27, 2019 at 21:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Not closest to the surface. That boundary layer is laminar, with varying thickness, which then turns turbulent. $\endgroup$ May 28, 2019 at 8:11

I'm not an aerodynamic expert by any measure so take this with a grain of salt, but from what I understand, this is because high speed air around a solid body forms a boundary layer. Below the boundary layer, the air immediately around the solid body is moving together at a very low speed relative to the solid body and this reduces to zero on the surface of the solid body.

The reason why the water is able to hold on for long is because, even though the plane is moving really fast, and that the air speed is really high outside the boundary layer; inside the boundary layer, the air is relatively still.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to Av.SE! $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    May 27, 2019 at 15:06

The main thing it tells you, in practical terms, applies when it's below freezing. That snow you think is going to blow off when you take off will not blow off wherever there is a significantly thick boundary layer (it will generally blow off down to the depth of the boundary layer, which can also be present at the leading edge and although very thin, it can leave enough surface roughness to kill you), which is why airliners are deiced everywhere, not just at the key areas of the leading edges.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .