One thing I noticed with the A380 is that it only seems to use the inboard thrust reversers while landing. I suspect it relates to FOD ingestion or perhaps damaging the runway. This is strange though, because the 747-8 (which also has a large wingspan and very large engines), does use all of its thrust reversers during landing. Does anyone have an official answer on why this is?
1 Answer
Why doesn't the A380 use its outboard thrust reversers?
Because it doesn't have (or need) any.
The A380 has reverse thrust on the inboard engines only. This saves weight and since the outboards are often way out over the edge of runways, decreases the risk of FOD.
From Airliners.net
Like all certified transport aircraft of this type, the A380 can stop from V1 on brakes alone with disks worn to minimum.
I've read that most airliners are allowed to take off even when all reverse-thrusters are inoperative. Most of the deceleration is handled by the brakes normally.
With the Airbus A380 weighing in fully loaded at 1,265,000 pounds, you might think stopping it within a reasonable distance after landing would require a Phalanx of Heavy-duty thrust reversers.
Truth be told, in the megaliner’s braking system, thrust reversers are the least critical components. Airliners are not required to have thrust reversers, and only the two inboard engines on the A380 are equipped with them. The decision not to install reversers on the A380’s two outboard engines saved weight and lowered the chances that those engines, which sometimes hang over runway edges, would be damaged by ingesting foreign objects.
The two reversers do help slow the A380—but not by much. In fact, unlike the thrust reversers on most airliners, including the Boeing 747 jumbo, they do not stop the aircraft in a shorter distance than brakes and spoilers alone. They do, however, take some of the strain off the brakes and are useful if water or snow makes the runway slippery.
From Airspace Magazine
More details of braking system
1. General
The aircraft has:
- Two Wing Landing Gears (WLG) with four wheel bogie assembly and related doors
- Two Body Landing Gears (BLG) with six wheel bogie assembly and related doors
- A Nose Landing Gear (NLG) with twin wheel assembly and related doors.
...
Braking
A. General
Carbon brakes are installed on each wheel of the WLG and on the wheels of the front and center axles of the BLG.
The braking system is electrically controlled and hydraulically operated.
The braking system has four braking modes plus autobrake and anti-skid systems:
- Normal braking with anti-skid capability
- Alternative braking with anti-skid capability
- Emergency Braking (with Ultimate Braking)
- Emergency braking without anti-skid protection is also available as an alternative function of the alternate braking system.
- A park brake system that is manually set is available for the BLG only. This system can also be used to supply emergency braking.
FOD risk
A380 Landing at Farnborough Airport
A380 vs 747
The design of the A380’s wings, with their large area, comparatively gentle sweep (33.5 degrees), and massive flaps, give the Airbus a landing speed that is 20 knots slower than that of a 747. An A380 crosses the landing threshold at a docile 140 knots and touches down, depending on its landing weight, at a speed as slow as 130 knots, about the same touchdown speed of some corporate jets that weigh 1/50th as much as the world’s biggest airliner.
-
7$\begingroup$ Millions of man-hours and dollars are spent on duplicate, triplicate (or more) redundant heterogeneous systems on aircraft. See Perdue University, College of Engineering $\endgroup$ Jun 18, 2014 at 14:06
-
7$\begingroup$ " It can stop from V1 on brakes alone with disks worn to minimum." - All aircraft can do this, it's a certification requirement and (partly) used to determine the runway requirements. But it's really bad for the hardware. White-hot brakes can (and do) set tires on fire, and replacing half of your undercarriage every time the pilot tries to exit on Charlie instead of Delta gets rather expensive. $\endgroup$– paulJun 18, 2014 at 21:23
-
2$\begingroup$ @PhilPerry doesn't apply on takeoff because the jet blast is behind the engine, and it's accelerating away from the debris. Point your exhaust forward while slowing down, and you will at some point inhale any debris you kick up. Some small bizjets do use sideways "reversers" but they are more "thrust cancellers" as they do not slow the aircraft in any way. $\endgroup$– paulJun 18, 2014 at 21:27
-
3$\begingroup$ @Gabriel: Foreign Object Damage. The outboard engines can be at the edge of the runway or over a grassed area, Reverse thrust on the outboard engines can throw debris (any loose material or objects) up in front of the engines where they will be sucked in (ingested) and may cause damage to the engine. $\endgroup$ Dec 7, 2016 at 23:03
-
2$\begingroup$ @RedGrittyBrick during the A380s design phase, Airbus originally wanted to do away with thrust reversers altogether - they add weight and maintenance cost to the airframe, and as all landings in commercial aircraft are required to be calculated without the use of thrust reversers, they are more of an unneeded item these days. The FAA said no, Airbus had to include a pair. So Airbus included a pair. There was lots of discussion on this online a decade ago, but much of it has been lost in the annals of time. $\endgroup$– MooDec 10, 2016 at 16:50