-4
$\begingroup$

One of the impediments and drawbacks to extending landing gear in light of building larger engines are the larger space required for the taller gear. Would hydraulic retractable gear that works as a truck jack (for changing tyres) that utilizes the same space but however taller gear work with aircraft and is it feasible and would it add extra weight. Would this system be able to use current hydraulic systems without significant additions?

Source

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As far as I'm aware, all current commercial airliners (with retractable gear) use hydraulics to extend/retract the gear. Are you referring to a system that uses a straight cylinder as pictured instead of the current folding gear? $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Mar 25 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ Even small planes use hydraulic landing gear. There are few, if any, strictly mechanical gear retraction systems. $\endgroup$ – CrossRoads Mar 25 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ @FreeMan yes I mean a straight cylinder that retracts and extends and then folds, so that it may still fit in the original bay $\endgroup$ – securitydude5 Mar 25 at 15:08
3
$\begingroup$

I think you mean gear legs that can hydraulically grow longer when they extend and shorter when they retract so you can have a longer gear that fits in the same gear bay.

It's been done on military designs. The Avro Arrow's Dowty designed main gear legs hydraulically lengthened and shortened, something like 8 inches or so, during extension and retraction, using a telescoping strut section separate from the shock absorbing section at the bottom, due to a limited envelope in the wing (they also had to make the wheel truck rotate to go flat in the wing because the leg retracts at a forward angle - a complicated mess).

CF 105 Arrow

Anyway, a complex and heavy solution, which is why you don't see it much. Not sure if it's ever been tried on a civilian airliner, but I'm sure it's at least been attempted some time some where.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The NLG of the 737 MAX-10 also extends by 9" (IIRC). There was something posted about this on another question. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Mar 25 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ @FreeMan: Close. It's the MLG of the 10 ;) $\endgroup$ – ymb1 Mar 25 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ @ymb1 that makes more sense - I was trying to figure out how an NLG extension would prevent tail strikes... $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Mar 25 at 17:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.