Modern passenger jets/airliners use aluminum 2 to 3 mm thick as their skin, their maximum speed is 900 km/h give or take. Modern passenger fighter jets travel at twice that speed on average.

What material is used to make their skin. If it's aluminum, is it thicker and why? Is it because of the extra cruising speed?

If specifics are required, I ask about the F-35.

  • $\begingroup$ "passenger fighter jets" ? $\endgroup$ – Jimy Feb 2 '19 at 19:55
  • $\begingroup$ Passenger Civilian aircraft $\endgroup$ – securitydude5 Feb 3 '19 at 13:03

The F35's skin consists of a/several composite(s). Although it's obviously classified, I suspect the main reason it's chosen has something to do with stealth rather than strength. Interestingly, there seem to be more information about the F22 than F35, which is supposed to be, err, more secretive? For example, the F22's airframe bulkheads and twin booms are known to be constructed from titanium, and there are aluminum elements in its wings, and its skin is composite as well. That's pretty much all that's let on.

If you are asking for some not-so-secretive fighters, they are made from more mundane materials, not that these are any less expensive: enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Uncle Sam's need to pay suppliers with other people's money greatly limits the extent of what he can keep classified. The F-35 program is especially well-documented due to its multinational scope. $\endgroup$ – Therac Feb 2 '19 at 15:36

"Modern fighter jet" and "F-35" are not synonymous. The F-35 is just one out of 20-30 fighter jets currently in full-scale production (depending on how you define "full-scale"), and it's not representative of the rest of them at all.

The majority of fighter jets have their skin made out of aluminum, of about the same thickness or a little thinner than on passenger airliners. Except in the wings, it's lightly loaded and not structurally essential, so it doesn't matter that aluminum's strength falls greatly at elevated temperatures.

There is also a lot less force put on the airframe at high speeds than they're designed to handle. Fighters are only able to maneuver well at 200-400 knots, well below the speed of sound. On the average, they travel at Mach 0.7-0.8, similar to passenger jets or slower, as they're not as aerodynamically clean. Supersonic flight is only used for interception, in a straight line, for short periods of time, to get at another aircraft.

The F-35's skin is made out of CYCOM 977 epoxy resin in most fuselage sections, CYCOM 5250 bismaleimide resin in the wings and some hotter surfaces, reinforced by ~700 ksi tensile, intermediate modulus carbon fiber, mostly Hexcel IM7. Bismaleimides generally offer better heat resistance than aluminum; epoxies are comparable to Al, depending on the specific alloys and resins being compared.

That said, the F-35 is about the slowest currently produced non-training fighter, and aluminum has proven to handle the higher heat stress in faster fighters just fine. But CFRP is a bit lighter, less prone to permanent bending than metal and provides much better adhesion with the outer layer of resin-embedded RAM. The latter two properties make composites essential for VLO (all-aspect stealth) aircraft.

P.S. More on various resins: What are typical resins used in carbon fiber for aircraft? Are any resins impossible to recycle?

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.