9
$\begingroup$

Perusing SkyVector today I noticed this airspace pattern: It can be viewed in more detail here.

What immediately jumped out at me is that

  • there are no charted airports in any of this airspace;
  • the RNAV routes crossing through this area are also class E, so in reality the airspace is not actually divided, but the VOR airway crossing in the northwest of the area gets different treatment; and
  • there is little discernible pattern to the airspace based on terrain, landmarks, or politics (e.g., it is more extensive to the north than to the south of the intersection, there is a very small extra bit in the southeast corner).

My best guess is that this airspace exists to facilitate IFR/VFR separation where three RNAV routes intersect, but that doesn't necessarily explain all the points above. I'm hoping that someone familiar with the area and/or better at searching FAA publications can lend some insight.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Inside the 8 charcteristic shapes, the Class G goes to 14,500' MSL, right? $\endgroup$ – quiet flyer Oct 10 '19 at 18:12
9
$\begingroup$

This is easier to explain in reverse: rather than why there is so much class G airspace there, why is there so much class E airspace everywhere else?

Remember, all airspace is class G unless it has been designated something higher. Wind your clock back to the early days of aviation, and the entire country was class G!

However, that isn't very safe, particularly in bad weather. Pilots were getting lost and running into each other.

So we got navaids and radios, and narrow strips of airspace along between navaids became controlled airways, i.e. class E. If you scroll over to Canada in SkyVector, you can see what this probably looked like.

Fast forward several decades, and there are now so many airways criss-crossing the US that they've merged into one big class E blanket, so it's easy to forget how we got here.

But there are still a few areas where the airway density never quite reached full saturation, mostly in mountainous terrain (of which Alaska has a lot), and those pockets still remain class G--and reveal the past.

As to why the V airway in your example has a different floor than the T airways, I'd assume that comes down to the minimum VOR reception altitude due to the terrain. Other than the floor, though, it's the same.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have a follow-up question: why not make class E start everywhere at 1,200 AGL, abolish the blue vignette, get rid of high-altitude class G and simplify charts and rules? What would be lost? Do people really need to fly VFR in low visibility at high altitude in Alaska? $\endgroup$ – scarpaz May 17 at 1:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.