Perusing SkyVector today I noticed this airspace pattern: It can be viewed in more detail here.

What immediately jumped out at me is that

  • there are no charted airports in any of this airspace;
  • the RNAV routes crossing through this area are also class E, so in reality the airspace is not actually divided, but the VOR airway crossing in the northwest of the area gets different treatment; and
  • there is little discernible pattern to the airspace based on terrain, landmarks, or politics (e.g., it is more extensive to the north than to the south of the intersection, there is a very small extra bit in the southeast corner).

My best guess is that this airspace exists to facilitate IFR/VFR separation where three RNAV routes intersect, but that doesn't necessarily explain all the points above. I'm hoping that someone familiar with the area and/or better at searching FAA publications can lend some insight.

  • $\begingroup$ Inside the 8 charcteristic shapes, the Class G goes to 14,500' MSL, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10, 2019 at 18:12

1 Answer 1


This is easier to explain in reverse: rather than why there is so much class G airspace there, why is there so much class E airspace everywhere else?

Remember, all airspace is class G unless it has been designated something higher. Wind your clock back to the early days of aviation, and the entire country was class G!

However, that isn't very safe, particularly in bad weather. Pilots were getting lost and running into each other.

So we got navaids and radios, and narrow strips of airspace along between navaids became controlled airways, i.e. class E. If you scroll over to Canada in SkyVector, you can see what this probably looked like.

Fast forward several decades, and there are now so many airways criss-crossing the US that they've merged into one big class E blanket, so it's easy to forget how we got here.

But there are still a few areas where the airway density never quite reached full saturation, mostly in mountainous terrain (of which Alaska has a lot), and those pockets still remain class G--and reveal the past.

As to why the V airway in your example has a different floor than the T airways, I'd assume that comes down to the minimum VOR reception altitude due to the terrain. Other than the floor, though, it's the same.

  • $\begingroup$ I have a follow-up question: why not make class E start everywhere at 1,200 AGL, abolish the blue vignette, get rid of high-altitude class G and simplify charts and rules? What would be lost? Do people really need to fly VFR in low visibility at high altitude in Alaska? $\endgroup$
    – scarpaz
    Commented May 17, 2020 at 1:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @scarpaz That explanation won’t fit in a comment, but feel free to ask a new question. $\endgroup$
    – StephenS
    Commented Nov 15, 2021 at 22:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .