Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
PBN which is contrast to conventional navigation consists of RNAV and RNP. And I know that general RNAV approach of IAP has up to 4 minima such as LPV, LNAV, LNAV/VNAV, and LP.
And I know that GLS approach is precision approach that use GBAS as well as GPS, but GLS approach procedure chart is separated with RNAV approach chart. I guess that GLS approach is RNAV approach because it use GPS system not conventional aids. Is it correct? is there any official document?
Is GLS an RNAV approach? Short answer is no. It is also not in the framework of PBN.
Out of confusion the naming was not standardized, which led to more confusion. This will be fixed, from 1 Dec 2022 only the term RNP will be permitted for the minima you mentioned. (ICAO Circular 336, starts at page 19)
It stands for area navigation, which is the ability to fly any course in an area, not bound by VOR radials for example.
GLS uses a ground augmented signal, anchor point, course, and slope, so it does just the one thing (like an ILS).
Another reclassification will start to impact the older terms precision approach, approach with vertical guidance, and non-precision approach. There will be only two main types, A and B. Here's a Eurocontrol slide that breaks them down, and also shows that GLS is not in the PBN scope:
Last but not least in case any of the above is confusing, this big Airbus presentation (icao.int, Sep 2017) covers the history from conventional navigation to PBN and beyond, and also talks about the GLS.
Addendum based on comments:
