7
$\begingroup$

An image search for 'helicopter' indicates that there isn't a consensus on whether to place the tail rotor to the left or the right of the tail boom, although I'm believe there may be a bias for left.

There never seems to have been a consensus: taking two popular early helicopter designs, the Bell 47 has its rotor on the right; the Hughes 269 on the left.

Bell 47 Bell 47 source

Hughes 269 Hughes 269 source

There are many left/right conventions in aviation, e.g. where the pilot sits, which side the passengers exit etc. So the question is, what governs the choice, and would it be beneficial if a 'right' side was generally agreed on?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps you'd also be surprised that there is no consensus regarding the rotation direction of the main rotor. Generally speaking, western helicopters' rotor will spin counterclockwise (except for helicopters built by Aérospatiale), while eastern will spin clockwise $\endgroup$ – DeepSpace Aug 28 '18 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Which may go part way to explaining rotor position: assuming tail rotors always pull rather than push (that's a guess), then it's the main rotor's spin direction which would dictate left or right for the tail. (However, there are lots of examples of both left and right western helicopters from many different manufacturers.) $\endgroup$ – Party Ark Aug 28 '18 at 12:04
  • $\begingroup$ Not necessarily. The tail rotor on the Blackhawk is on the right $\endgroup$ – DeepSpace Aug 28 '18 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ note also that the rotors of the two copters in the question spin in the same direction. $\endgroup$ – Federico Aug 28 '18 at 12:47
  • $\begingroup$ ok, interesting, so if the main rotors spin in the same direction, presumably one of the tail rotors pushes and one pulls? $\endgroup$ – Party Ark Aug 28 '18 at 15:43
9
$\begingroup$

It's hard to say the design rational used for all helicopter manufacturers. Push vs pull doesn't seem to be very important.

One example is the Bell UH-1 Huey (Left side Pull). When Bell modified the design for civilian use 205, 212, 412, 214, they put the TR on the (RH side Push). When asked about the reasoning for the original Huey/205 change, Bell engineers explained that they found better TR effectiveness with rotation of forward blade climbing, as the interaction with wake and vortices of the main rotor was more favorable in this configuration.

Now look at the AH-1 Cobra Gunship variants. Bell switched sides at least twice. Left on early models, switched to right on later 2 blade models (AH-1W). Back to Left side for the 4 blade AH-1Z. While on opposite sides, the AH-1W and AH-1Z are both forward blade climbing.

Sikorsky? S-76(Left - Climbing) H-60(Right - Climbing) H-53(Left - Climbing). One could speculate that the higher the TR is mounted, the more this rational comes into play.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.