How to measure the aircraft maintenance cost of a operator? What tool or mechanism can be used to measure such performance? Or what index can be used to determine the performance?


closed as too broad by TomMcW, ymb1, fooot, Peter Kämpf, Carlo Felicione Jun 15 '18 at 5:28

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ You would have to have access to the airline's internal data. $\endgroup$ – John K Jun 14 '18 at 17:13
  • $\begingroup$ Assume I have the data, I mean how to do the analysis. $\endgroup$ – Yan Jun 15 '18 at 1:29

Maintenance costs are generally expressed as dollars per flight hour for a particular aircraft type. Chargeable labour hours, parts, overhauls, delay costs, repairs etc., on airplane model X, divided by that airline's total flight hours on that particular type.

This kind of data will be broken down and tracked at the Line Replaceable Unit level as an hourly operating cost of the LRU itself. Like, say, a hydraulic pump will have all expenses related to maintaining that particular part number, including repairs, overhauls, and chargeable delays/cancellations caused by failures, all added up to a global dollar amount per flight hour for that pump. This is also tracked by the aircraft manufacturer for the entire fleet.

That number will be used to assess whether the pump is better or worse than the global fleet for that aircraft type, or compared to the same pump used on other aircraft models, to decide whether to pay for improvements, look into changing the maintenance practices, soft timing the pump (overhauling sooner than the legal requirement), and other actions. There will be some alarm threshold established, say >$1.00 per hour, or 85 cents/hour or whatever, the airline will use to determine whether something should be done or not.

If the pump manufacturer introduces a product reliability improvement, it will be sold to the airline as providing X cents reduction in hourly costs of that LRU, along with X percent improvement in dispatch reliability. The airline will do a business case to decide if the long term saving is worth the up front expense. They usually go by a payback period, where for example the projected hourly saving from doing an upgrade will pay for the cost of the upgrade within 5 years, or less depending on how cheap the operator is (over the last 10-15 years, a lot of US regionals have been only buying upgrades that pay for themselves in 1 year).


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.