What is the maximum weight for a pilot to use the ejection seat in an F-100 fighter?

  • 6
    I'm amused that it takes FOUR YEARS for a popular aviation website to get it's first user named PILOT. people these days... – Jihyun Jun 10 at 2:49
  • @vidarlo I know, just pointing something funny out. – Jihyun Jun 10 at 20:07
  • I wonder if there's actual a hard limit. The seat is designed for a specific weight so anywhere away from that increases the risk. But ejection isn't safe anyway so it's not like once out of certain limit then it's guarantee to fail, and there's not a limit to guarantee a success, either. – user3528438 Jul 10 at 17:51

Firstly, welcome to Aviation Stack Exchange! As for your question, I actually could not find the exact model used for the F-100 series (sorry), but as far as I can tell most American first and second generation jet fighters were installed with Martin-Baker Mk.1-3 ejection seats. These were some of the first examples of explosive charges being used as the main propellant, and for the sake of a shorter answer I will assume you understand their basic operation. The Martin-Baker website states that the for the given size range of crew (between the 5th and 95th percentile), the seat could manage to lift a 224lb pilot/aircrew at a maximum of over 400 knots indicated airspeed.

[Edit] I want to address @GypsyRanger's answer: I think we can all assume that the pilot being ejected from the fighter has undergone and passed Air Force criteria for qualification to be a fighter pilot. I personally think his question is simple but a good one because he is just asking the weight limit, and in terms of mass this shouldn't be too hard to answer. I myself couldn't find the exact model, but all main-stream American jet fighters of the F-100's era were fitted with Martin-Baker seats ranging from the Mk.1 to the Mk.3. If you take the time to look at the specifications for each and compare, or knew beforehand you'd know that the improvements between each model were mostly pertaining to reliability and safety for crew, something that they were lacking in at the time (the firing mechanism was practically the only thing changed throughout). Really though, don't be too quick to criticize if you won't put in the time to read it or because it's a short question.

  • thanks this is very helpful, the MB website most useful. hadnt thought about that. this is for a ride in a privately owned f-100 backseat for this ol' fighter pilot that has gained a bit of weight... – Pilot Jun 10 at 17:32
  • Ah. As long as you are somewhere close to that recommended range it shouldn't be too much of an issue. Remember, the seat was certified to carry a pilot with a full combat load (all of his gear, survival kit etc) out of a dead fighter at speeds that I'm not sure you'll be even close too. Be safe and have fun though! – Jihyun Jun 10 at 20:07
  • Yah, I was 210 when I flew the hun and the sluf and a few others but that was almost 4 decades ago. – Pilot Jun 10 at 22:03

Depends on a few variables, including the amount of separating power the ejection seat has, and most of all how tall the pilot is. The current weight limit pertains to and is based on height. Pilots have to meet the Air Force's height, weight and physical conditioning requirements. They must be 64 to 77 inches tall when standing, and 34 to 40 inches tall when sitting. They must weigh 160 to 231 pounds, depending on height. But, the question is a bit too broad because you do not list the variant of the fighter and what type of ejection seat and launching system is used.

  • Old weight limits were 136 to 213lbs. The F-100 Super Sabre had 4 different variations of the ejection seat. – Ron Beyer Jun 10 at 2:36
  • @RonBeyer oh I was under the impression that only the MB Mk.1 to Mk.3 were used for active role F-100's. What is the fourth? – Jihyun Jun 10 at 2:42
  • 1
    Do you have a source for the minimum weight and height? A 64 inch tall person would be overweight (almost obese) even with the minimum weight of 160 pounds. – Gypaets Jun 10 at 11:07

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.