5
$\begingroup$

Can anyone identify the fighter here in this picture taken from a Dornier-do17?

enter image description here

From: https://stukablr.tumblr.com/post/145040185970/a-pic-took-it-from-a-donier-do17-a-hurricane

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note the link states its a hurricane. $\endgroup$ – Dave Apr 29 '18 at 21:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sadly, many a German airman's last words. $\endgroup$ – A. I. Breveleri Apr 29 '18 at 21:55
11
$\begingroup$

Relative thickness of the airfoil, thickness repartition over span, and low dihedral angle of the entire wing, tells it's a Hurricane.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

In addition to @qq jkztd's very good answer, I'd like to add that the Spitfire never had a such a wide oil radiator under the fuselage. That to me was the dead giveaway that it was a Hurricane. Quite a durable but honestly lackluster fighter.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, all the silhouettes I can quickly find of Spitfires have the radiator under one or both wings, not under the fuselage. $\endgroup$ – Chromatix Apr 29 '18 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ Try looking at the illustration on the Spitfire Wikipedia page: all Spits had radiators under the fuselage, Hurricanes did not. $\endgroup$ – Tim Lymington supports Monica Apr 29 '18 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ @TimLymington that is clearly false - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Spitfire#/media/… vs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker_Hurricane#/media/… $\endgroup$ – egid Apr 29 '18 at 18:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jihyun But fairly well on par with the Do.17, designed around the same time. Also it was way easier and cheaper to build than a Spit, which was significant with wartime resources and serious technical problems with the Spitfire. Spitfires simply weren't ready in numbers by 1940. $\endgroup$ – Graham Apr 29 '18 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Yes the small inlet there is for the carburetor air intake. It's really a simple matter of googling and checking various sources. And it's quite obvious. No radiator is that small XD. @Graham yes the Hurricane was sufficient for defense of the British Isles, but that was it. A point and shoot interceptor with little future except for limited recce and ground attack (which I admit it was adept at). I obviously have bias for the beautiful Spit. $\endgroup$ – Jihyun Apr 30 '18 at 14:58
2
$\begingroup$

It's a Hurricane. No Spitfire of any Mark had a radiator under the fuselage, whereas every Hurricane, from the prototype to the "Last of the Many" did. And that is NOT a carburetor (carburettor in British English) air inlet. Re the comment about the canopy, Mark I Spits had a narrow canopy. No framed greenhouse, but not blown out at the sides either. The earliest Mark I Spits had a canopy that effectively was just an extension of the windscreen. Later ones had a bulged top for more head clearance, but still had flat sides. Later Marks featured the "blown" canopy that was bulged on the sides as well.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Av.SE! $\endgroup$ – Ralph J Oct 14 '18 at 4:39
1
$\begingroup$

Agree with qq jkztd.

Also the canopy. You can just about make out the lines (in profile, it looks like a greenhouse) plus it's narrower. A Spit's is more bulbous.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.