3
$\begingroup$

From and related to: What is the relation between drag and weight?

  • Friction drag is not affected by the angle of attack change.
  • The [induced] drag will increase with the square of the mass increase.

I have no doubt about that, in fact I was going to post the same answer, the reason I waited is because I could not explain the A320 performance figures using this method.

The drag breakdown for an A320 at FL 370 and M0.78 is:

7,900 lbf of drag is composed of 4,700 lbf of parasitic drag (...) and 3,200 lbf of induced drag.

Let's consider a 32% weight increase -- from 50 to 66 tonnes. Applying 1.32^2 to the induced drag raises the total drag by 30%.

If we used the FF (fuel flow) as a thrust (also drag) measure -- since at a given FL / IAS / TAS the TSFC shouldn't vary that much when the N1 is ± a few percent --

enter image description here

... we find the ΔFF is 7% at FL 290 and 20% at FL 370. 20% is closer to the 30% thrust/drag estimate. Why is the thrust/drag increase much lower at a lower FL with weight the only variable?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

At a lower flight level the air density is higher, so a lower lift coefficient can be trimmed and the induced drag is a smaller fraction of total drag. Hence, the mass increase causes a much lower increase in overall drag.

At higher altitude the friction and pressure drag is lower but the induced drag is higher, so increasing the mass will cause a much higher jump in drag.

Now for the numbers: In FL 290 the indicated speed is 155.362 m/s, so the dynamic pressure $q$ is 14,784 N/m². I use surface area $S$ (124 m²) and aspect ratio $AR$ (b²/S = 10.33) from Wikipedia and guess that the Oswald factor $\epsilon$ is 0.8. Now the lift coefficient $c_L$ at FL 290 and 50 tons mass is $$c_L = \frac{m\cdot g}{q\cdot S} = 0.2675$$ This allows us to calculate the induced drag: $$D_i = q\cdot S\cdot\frac{c_L^2}{\pi\cdot AR\cdot\epsilon} = 5052\:\text{N}$$ which is just 1136 pound-force; about a third of what you give for FL370. This fits well with the given thrust increase at FL290 which is about ⅓ of the increase at FL370.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.