24
$\begingroup$

Large, modern multi-engine airplanes do mostly have the 'tricycle' landing gear type. But it hasn't always be the norm. I remember at least one big plane with 'conventional landing gear', the German four-engined FW 200 'Condor'...

But, was it the largest of them all...?

$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ How is largest defined? MTOW? $\endgroup$ – Koyovis Nov 8 '17 at 11:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibly Asiana 214. Granted, it wasn't supposed to be a tail dragger. $\endgroup$ – reirab Nov 9 '17 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ What is a taildragger/tricycle landing gear/conventional landing gear? $\endgroup$ – Pureferret Nov 9 '17 at 17:44
31
$\begingroup$

If you are going by MTOW, I believe that would be the Junkers Ju 390, which had a maximum takeoff weight of 75,500 kg.

Ju 390

Junkers Ju 390, By Bundesarchiv, Bild 141-0072 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, Link

Sadly, only a couple of these were built. If you are going by the wingspan, that would be the Tupolev ANT-20 'Maksim Gorki', which had a wingspan of 63m

Maksim Gorki

ANT-20, By Unknown - http://www.dkvnukovo.ru/photos/museum/photos/35.jpg, Public Domain, Link

$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ They could have fitted probably 8 more people in if they had put seats and windows in those awesome wheel nacelles. Probably no trolley service though. Cattle class for sure. $\endgroup$ – Wossname Nov 8 '17 at 13:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Wossname: Most modern planes have huge empty spaces in the fuselage, which is already pressured. Those nacelles are most certainly not pressurized! I believe that most aircraft carrying capacity limits are due to mass (weight), not volume. $\endgroup$ – dotancohen Nov 8 '17 at 14:08
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @dotancohen, I have much to learn. $\endgroup$ – Wossname Nov 8 '17 at 15:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Wossname: Then I'm in good company, and we're both in the right place! $\endgroup$ – dotancohen Nov 8 '17 at 15:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That Art Deco fuselage on the ANT-20 is pretty slick $\endgroup$ – TomMcW Nov 9 '17 at 1:27
13
$\begingroup$

I nominate the Tupolev ANT-20, with a wing span of 63.00 m (206 ft 8¼ in), an empty weight of 28,500 kg (62,700 lb), and a MTOW of 53,000 kg (116,600 lb).

2 were built, first flight was 1934.

enter image description here
(tupolev.ru) Note the two engines above the fuselage.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

I nominate the XB-15 heavy bomber prototype.

  • Wing span 45.43 m
  • Max. TO weight 32,139 kg

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Better looking than mine :D $\endgroup$ – ymb1 Nov 8 '17 at 11:06
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @ymb1 Yes but the production run of yours was 100% higher. $\endgroup$ – Koyovis Nov 8 '17 at 11:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh c'mon Gorki looks great! :) $\endgroup$ – PeterM Nov 8 '17 at 12:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.