3
$\begingroup$

Can someone explain the design of glider wing airfoils and the subsequent pressure distribution over them?

I hypothesize that:

  1. The pressure distribution should form a resultant force in the forward, upward direction, since two components of force are required to maintain equilibrium in the flight of a glider: a) lift - in equal opposition to weight, and b) a forward component of the total reaction generated by the airfoil - in opposition to drag.

  2. Thus I conclude that the angle of attack of a glider airfoil relative to flight direction would be negative, in order to achieve a forward component opposing drag; although it would be positive relative to airflow, such as to generate low pressure over the wings. Either that or the camber is designed such that the two mentioned criterias here, (a) and (b), are upheld.

Should there not be any opposition to drag, I would expect to see the glider decelerate in the forward direction, until the airflow stalls over the wings, and the glider loses lift and falls.

I am also curious to know about the various designs of glider airfoils: a) what are the criterias defining them, and b) how do they differ from those of powered aircraft, if there are any differences at all?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The foward component opposing drag is the glider's weight, not forward lift component (which I don't think is technically possible anyway). Take a close look at forces in flight for a gliding/descending aircraft: Lift equals only part of total weight. Drag opposes the remaining one $\endgroup$ – Radu094 Sep 24 '17 at 8:09
  • $\begingroup$ Difference between lift and drag is rather arbitrary, both is caused by more-or-less the same physical phenomena and you can see it as only one (total) aerodynamic force caused by air flowing around the airplane. For practical purposes, this force is usually divided into two components, one, lift, is by definition perpendicular to the direction of motion, second (drag) is parallel. But for the glider, I believe, it is the most easy to think only one total aerodynamic force which is during steady flight always same magnitude and opposite direction to the gravity. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sep 24 '17 at 12:14
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, & that would be induced drag. There is however profile drag & parasitic drag which will always apply on any body moving through a fluid, namely, air in this case. This drag force will have to be opposed in order to maintain an equilibrium descent along the glide angle; how can this be done is one part of my question above. $\endgroup$ – Guha.Gubin Sep 24 '17 at 15:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is also worth noting that many glider wings (especially the case for trainers) do not have a uniform shape across the whole wing. Many glider wings have different cross sections to allow for one part of the wing to stall before the rest of the wing. This acts as an alert to the pilot that a stall is imminent but still allowing the pilot to have control using the rest of the wing. $\endgroup$ – AndyW Sep 27 '17 at 6:07
4
$\begingroup$

The pressure distribution over a glider's wing is no different from that of a well-designed aircraft. A glider can maintain flight by flying slightly downwards, so the direction of motion is not straight but slightly down. Doing this in rising air will result in sustained flight.

Forces acting on a glider

Look at the sketch above: The flight path angle $\gamma$ is negative and in still air the flight path vector $\text{x}_k$ is parallel to the direction of the airspeed. Due to the inclination of the flight path, the lift vector is tilted forward such that its horizontal component is exactly opposite to the drag force. This is shown on the right where I moved the vectors into a closed sequence which demonstrates that all forces balance.

From the viewpoint of the glider, the lift is pointing straight up and drag directly backwards, but the weight force is slightly tilted forward. In a way, it seems that the thrust of a glider is its weight force.

Now let the whole air packet in which the glider flies move up. The glider will still sink down within this air but relative to the ground it will gain altitude if the upward air velocity is high enough.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great answer as always, but that picture might cause some miunderstandings; Pet peeve, but too many people confuse this: even though flight path angle is negative,the angle ot attack is still positive. $\endgroup$ – Radu094 Sep 25 '17 at 7:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Radu094: Yes, you're right. But to show the AoA I would need to add the airplane coordinate system and complicate things even more, so I decided to leave it off. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Sep 25 '17 at 7:18
1
$\begingroup$

I think you are approaching this problem wrong. If you think about how a glider flies, there is no forward force component on the airfoil that opposes drag. By definition, drag is the force that opposes the motion of the craft and lift is perpendicular to the drag force.

Suppose we drop the glider from some height in a typical flight position (ie fuselage parallel to the ground). The only way this glider is going to fly forward (assuming no tailwind) is by dropping the nose, creating a negative angle of attack with respect to the ground. The lift generated by airfoil here will have both horizontal and vertical components relative to the ground. However, you are also losing altitude in this orientation. The point here is, without initial speed (forward momentum) the only way to create forward speed is to convert potential energy into kinetic energy by losing altitude, so a negative angle of attack will create forward speed, but will cost you altitude.

As to your other questions in regard to glider airfoil design vs propelled aircraft airfoiled design, glider airfoil are typically low camber, low lift, and low drag. This is because while higher camber airfoil generate more lift, they also generate significantly higher drag. This would cause the glider to lose forward momentum faster. Since lift is a function of velocity, your glider loses lift during this time and will fall out of the sky. With propulsion, these airfoil can be used to carry heavier loads (since more lift is generated and the propulsion directly counteracts drag forces). Gliders are typically light and therefore require less lift to stay aloft. The low drag profiles allow them to maintain forward momentum and speed without losing much altitude.

In general, you always want the pressure below the wing to be higher than the pressure above the wing. As soon as this condition is not met, the plane/glider will begin to fall from the sky. Also note that just because the pressure below is higher than the pressure above does not guarantee the aircraft will stay aloft. The upward force generated by this pressure (F=P x Area) must exceed the downward force caused by gravity (F=Mass x Gravity).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.