3
$\begingroup$

I read in the Airbus A320 FCTM (p349), normal procedures descent section:

The flight crew can insert a lower VAPP in the MCDU PERF APPR, down to VLS, if landing is performed without A/THR, without wind and no ice accretion.

You have no margin against a stall condition. Why is that possible to decrease VAPP till VLS?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

... if landing is performed without A/THR...

Then theoretically you don't need the VAPP [setting] and should fly a bit faster, it's only a speed bug in this situation.

... without wind...

Even if the METAR is reporting an average of 0 knots, there is always a breeze here and there.

... no margin against a stall...

You have a 23% margin. VLS is 1.23 VS at 1G (check FCOM 4.03.20). So if the stall is at 120 knots, then VLS is 148 knots.

Note:

VAPP should be at least VLS +5 kt.

So VAPP even becomes 153 knots, 33 knots above stall. Plus the A320 by design has anti-stall measures if the flight laws are not degraded.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How about the relation between Vls and Vmcl? I have read on Safety First Airbus (online version) that Vls should be equal or greater than Vmcl. That's means that in a Go-Around situation flying manually decelerating below Vls (High speed protection engaged) I could lose control of the aircraft? Anybody can shed some light on it, please? $\endgroup$ – Andrea Ghilardi Apr 20 at 9:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AndreaGhilardi: I think the VMCL definition in FCOM PRO-SUP-10 should help. It's for an engine out at takeoff power, and VAPP still give you at least an additional 5 knots. $\endgroup$ – ymb1 Apr 20 at 12:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.