2
$\begingroup$

Flu? Pneumonia? Anthrax? smallpox? Do you have to worry about them or there are designs in place to prevent them? Like some sort of sophisticated ventilation system?

Models to work with: Most common ones: Boeing 737, Airbus A320

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you have to worry? Not really. Although the there are no filtering systems to catch pathogens it's not appreciably different from other modes of shared transportation like buses and trains. $\endgroup$
    – GdD
    Sep 12, 2017 at 8:22

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

I'm afraid you're probably not going to like the answer! And really, the model makes little or no difference.

The MITRE Corporation did some studies on this and a good summary can be found in the article Detecting Aircraft Pathogens Before It's Too Late

The summary points are

the researchers determined that most particles stayed suspended in the aisle, so when booking a trip, take a window seat

and

Particles also did not travel far outside the contaminated row, and if they did, it was across the row. Previously, it was thought that contaminants would travel front to back, or back to front.

Most worryingly:

The need for such sensors was evident in the 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which originated in an Air China flight from Hong Kong to Beijing, spread through 18 countries, and resulted in 774 fatalities. Asian economies suffered $11 billion in damages

As for controlling pathogens on board an aircraft, the CDC provide guidance which involves the same procedures you'd use on the ground (Hand washing, PPE, handling of bodily fluids).

Although air is no doubt filtered, as far as I know there is nothing special about the filters used on Aircraft that would be unique to aviation, nor offer any additional defense against airborne pathogens.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Wow so this is basically another "since it makes little economic sense, we ain't gonna go that extra mile" stuff? $\endgroup$
    – Matt Cox
    Sep 13, 2017 at 2:05
2
$\begingroup$

No, not more than about catching a bug at any populated and air conditioned space. Some of the air in the cockpit is recirculated and before it re-enters the cockpit, it is filtered through HEPA filters. From this document:

The vast majority of U.S. airliners use high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) recirculation filters for cabin air, and these filters are highly effective at collection of solid and liquid particulates.

These filters can remove 99.97% of particles up to 0.3 µm, as defined by MIL-STD-282 Method 102.9.1. Bacterial and viral particles are smaller, but the size of 0.3 µm is chosen because it is the hardest one to filter, smaller particles are caught in the HEPAs with a high rate (up to 98%) as well. In hospitals the filters are used together with strong ultraviolet light to kill the bacteria could by the filters.

Notice that the document above mentions that most US airlines use HEPA, which implies that filtering practices are airline dependent and not prescribed by FAA. The advise seems to be: fly a reputable airline.

Do you have to worry about bacteria and viruses on board of aircraft? If you're truly worried, wear a mask:

Though it’s inconclusive whether masks can block airborne viruses, “one thing we learned from the literature that we looked at is that if the healthy person is wearing a mask and walks into a sickroom and touches infected surfaces, the mask makes it hard to touch his or her own nose and mouth,” says Finkelstein, who is also an associate professor at Harvard Medical School.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I doubt most of the masks you see people wearing about are actually HEPA masks, and none of the one's I've ever seen are sealed around the mouth and nose well enough to keep anything bacterial sized out. They will keep you from directly touching your face, so they should slow the progress of anything you may have on your hand. Not attacking your answer, just providing something to think about. $\endgroup$
    – FreeMan
    Sep 12, 2017 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ @FreeMan Yes there is nothing that can provicde a 100% guarantee of not catching a contagious bug. We can only reduce the chance, and if a mask helps by any mechanism than it may be worthwhile to wear one. $\endgroup$
    – Koyovis
    Sep 12, 2017 at 22:24
  • $\begingroup$ A mask - that is perfectly logical, but not that reasonable. Some international flights take up to 22 hours - it's simply impossible to wear a mask for that long. $\endgroup$
    – Matt Cox
    Sep 13, 2017 at 2:08
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Some flights (perhaps more) only take 4 hours though. Nobody can give you a method that guarantees 100% of success in 100% of circumstances. $\endgroup$
    – Koyovis
    Sep 13, 2017 at 2:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .