4
$\begingroup$

In several places I've seen reference to the Buran automated landing where it supposedly did a go-around and came in for a second landing attempt. I was under the impression that the Buran was unpowered and therefore didn't have any ability to fire engines to regain speed (and therefore altitude) for another landing attempt. Is this go-around an urban legend, or am I mistaken about what Buran was capable of doing on landing?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: Was the unmanned flight and landing of the Buran spacecraft in 1988 exceptional? $\endgroup$ – fooot Apr 28 '17 at 18:31
  • $\begingroup$ The landings of gliding craft like the 'Buran' or the 'Shuttle' are probably fully computerized, so that 'go-around' is probably false. However, and at least in theory, the glide path may be intercepted by the aircraft at different altitudes, if it's also true that the 'Buran' or the 'shuttle' are notoriously bad gliders, and that the altitude lost between two interception attempts would be very large... Hence, it's better to do it right the first time... $\endgroup$ – xxavier Apr 28 '17 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ It had two approaches, that isn't to say that it was a go-around, two different things. You can abort an approach and attempt another with a respectable amount of altitude and distance from the landing site. $\endgroup$ – Ron Beyer Apr 28 '17 at 18:47
6
$\begingroup$

Unlike Space Shuttle, Buran could cary Saturn AL-31 jet engines. The testing version had four such engines and used to take off and then fly under own power during the tests. Hence it so should have been capable of go-around. The powered landing increased the safety of Buran in comparison to Space Shuttle (source).

Here it is possible to find the description of the jet engine system of Buran. This source names the engines as АЛ-31Ф (Su-33 has the same). It says two engines were foreseen for the space going version, and this would have not been sufficient to take off under own power. Each engine had the maximal thrust of 7770 kgf (afterburners were removed). The two extra engines of the take of - capable prototype were more powerful (12500 kgf).

The source also says jet that engines were not installed during the only space flight 15 November 1988 while there were non-functional engine controls in the cockpit. The engines were not ready yet.

Hence most likely the sources OP references talk about some go-around of the mentioned four - engine testing prototype, not about the go-around of the Buran returning from space.

The space going version of the Buran space shuttle was not capable of go around maneuver.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your source shows pictures of the Buran during its first (and only) unmanned space flight and does not have the jet engines installed. The jet engines were never used for for a rocket launched Buran, only the in-atmosphere test vehicle. The OP is asking about the automatic landing during its only space flight. $\endgroup$ – Ron Beyer Apr 28 '17 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ I was told the Buran did an unpowered go-around due to possessing too much energy to land. $\endgroup$ – Joshua Jul 6 '18 at 17:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.