I'm a little confused about the QFE and QNH definitions, and its application on aviation. I learnt that:
$QFE$ = pressure measured by an altimeter which is adjusted to ground level (it gives a height of 0 when the airplane is on the ground).
$QNH$ = pressure measured by an altimeter which is adjusted to sea level (it gives the field elevation when the airplane is on the ground).
So, by those definitions we can say that on ground level $QFE=p_0=101325Pa$ and $QNH=p_{ISA}(h_e)$ where $p_0$ is the SSL pressure and $h_e$ is the field elevation. $p_{ISA}$ is the pressure on a standard atmosphere associated to the height $h$. For the troposphere we have:
$$p_{ISA}[Pa]=101325\left(1-\frac{0.0065 h[m]}{288.15}\right)^{5.25588}$$
So, pressure drops with an height increment. For example, if the field elevation is positive (i.e. it's above the sea level) and the airplane is above the field we have to have $QFE>QNH$, because the height measured by $QFE$ configuration is lesser that the height measured by $QNH$ ($h_{QHN}=h_{QFE}+h_e$ and $h_e>0$)configuration, and by the relation between $p$ and $h$ if $h_{QFE}<h_{QNH}$, then $p_{QFE}>p_{QNH}$.
What I have seen in many problems of QFE determination by QNH and vice versa, is that the definitions used for QFE, QNH were exchanged. See for example this question How can I calculate QNH from QFE?.
I've seen this type of resolution done in many exercises, and so I presume that I'm wrong! But I still didn't get it! What am I missing here?
I can even show you a figure that was used on the theoretical slides of my Aircraft Performance course:
As you can see this figure says that $h_{QFE}=h_{QNH}+h_e$ which should instead be $h_{QNH}=h_{QFE}+h_e$ (the opposite) according to the $QFE$ and $QNH$ definitions.