4
$\begingroup$

According to this website the Boeing 737 aircraft use 2 IRS and 2 GPS: IRS L & IRS R. Why? Apparently they are totally independent of each other.

Could somebody explain a little bit why they need 2 separate GPS and 2 separate IRS?

Follow-up question: this same website states: "POS INIT is used to enter the aircraft position into the IRS's for alignment". What is meant by "alignment"?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related question $\endgroup$ – Notts90 Mar 9 '17 at 11:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For the same reason they use two engines: Redundancy. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Aug 2 '17 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ Or at least two of everything, and everyone, too. $\endgroup$ – user3528438 Jan 30 '18 at 22:49
9
$\begingroup$

Could somebody explain a little bit why they need 2 separate GPS and 2 separate IRS?

So that if one fails, the other can still be used to complete the flight.

Airbus even have 3.

What is meant by "alignment"?

Initialization of the system and solving the "heading problem" through a magnetometer. But this is a different question.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thx for your answer. But if it is only for redundancy and they do not communicate amongs eacht other. How do they compensate the differences in measurements of both systems? 3 isn't that overkill? $\endgroup$ – traducerad Mar 9 '17 at 9:42
  • $\begingroup$ @traducerad there is usually a third system that performs what is called "voting and monitoring" $\endgroup$ – Federico Mar 9 '17 at 9:43
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @traducerad, The use of 3 identical systems is what is known as triple redundancy. Let's say you have only have 2 systems, and 1 of them begins to show different readings than the other. How do you know which to believe? With 3 systems in total, if 1 begins to show different numbers, you will know that the 2 other ones are more than likely the "correct" ones. $\endgroup$ – Prodnegel Mar 9 '17 at 14:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @traducerad - redundancy is what keeps the plane safe should something go wrong with a single system. I'm sure that manufacturers & airlines would love to do away with redundancy because it adds weight, complexity and cost which take away from cargo capacity, range and profit. However, they prefer to not have the bad publicity of planes falling out of the sky due to a failure in a single system. There are probably many single-system failures every day that have essentially zero impact on a flight arriving safely due to the redundant systems. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Mar 9 '17 at 15:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Federico, no, it is easiest to solve at Equator, because there the axis of rotation lies in the local horizontal plane. The methods are actually both used, because magnetometer gives magnetic heading, and that is used for heading indicator, while the gyroscopic method (gyrocompass is a gyro with attached weight so the axis is horizontal, but I expect IRS to simply spin up all axis gyros, measure the rotation and align the coordinate system accordingly) gives true heading, which is needed by the inertial navigation system. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Aug 2 '17 at 22:09

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.