I don't fly, don't have a clue. But one of the main characters in my book DOES: it's a Cessna 152, just him at 14 stone and a couple of small bags, all conditions are perfect and he's flown from about 140 NM away. Would 5000ft be about the right altitude?

The question is: how far away is the runway (a grass one on an unlicensed airfield) when he starts his descent? It's a direct approach, no pattern.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have a look at this question/answer. It should be enough to get you in an acceptable range. $\endgroup$ – Dan Priest Mar 8 '17 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ Also, regarding altitude, see this question, it would depend on the direction of flight and if they are VFR or IFR. $\endgroup$ – Ron Beyer Mar 8 '17 at 21:33
  • $\begingroup$ I applaud you for asking. I've been reading the Dirk Pitt novels by Clive Cussler, and his descriptions of flying have a tenuous grasp on reality, based on what I've learned here, and it's rather distracting. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Mar 9 '17 at 15:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Regarding whether the cruising altitude is appropriate, assuming he's flying VFR (Visual Flight Rules), he should be at an odd thousand plus 500 ft for east headings (360-179 degrees) or an even thousand plus 500 ft for west headings (180-359 degrees). Also, you didn't specify a field elevation. $\endgroup$ – Fred Larson Mar 9 '17 at 17:32

For a comfortable decent you generally want to come down at 500 Ft/Min on the Vertical speed indicator. The 152 is doing about 95Kts over the ground (assuming no wind). So you are covering about 1.5 miles a minute to round it off. So you need to drop 5000 ft on your approach to the area. At a comfortable rate that will take about 10 minutes. In that time, covering 1.5 miles a minute, you will need to start your decent about 15 nautical miles out.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ While this method of calculation does apply towards answering this question, your answer does not. The question specifies a straight in approach with no pattern flown, thus the descent is to be made to the field elevation. A more correct answer would be about 15 NM, which is true either for a 3° descent path, or for your calculation method. $\endgroup$ – J Walters Mar 9 '17 at 4:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I must have overlooked that last sentence. I have corrected as such. $\endgroup$ – Dave Mar 9 '17 at 13:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you guys SOO much! I've used the advice and finally got the character down realistically. His next flight to same airfield is in hot summer months and it's on the east coast so maybe he'll come in from over the sea to avoid thermals from land. Realistic scenario for experienced pilot? Thanks again, you've been quick and really helpful. $\endgroup$ – Nathan K Strawn Mar 11 '17 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ @NathanKStrawn that really depends on the airport but generally speaking you can come in from over water. However you are limited as to how far out over the water you can fly here in the US due to the ADIZ which you dont really cross unless you are leaving the country. $\endgroup$ – Dave Mar 11 '17 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ @NathanKStrawn However most pilots generally avoid flying over open water if they can help it. There is no reason, and perhaps an increased risk to go out over water if you can get to where you need to be over land only. $\endgroup$ – Dave Mar 11 '17 at 17:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.