Can anyone explain what a fused track is from the perspective of radar?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I believe it's where data is aggregated from multiple radars and tracks are correlated with each other. $\endgroup$
    – Steve
    Feb 1 '17 at 15:05
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Don't understand why this has so many downvotes - more context would be nice but is hardly essential. $\endgroup$ Feb 1 '17 at 19:13

A fused radar track is a track (series of radar detections belonging to the same aircraft) that contains information from detections by multiple radars.

Creating a fused track seems a simple thing to accomplish, however it is not as easy as it may seem.

First of all, lets look at a mono-sensor track. That is a series of detections by a single sensor belonging to the same aircraft. The tracking system has to determine for each detection to which track it belongs to associate the flight data (e.g track label) for that track to the plot (display of the detection on the screen). For primary radar systems (and to lesser extent Mode A/C radar) this can already be difficult when tracks are crossing each other at shallow angles. Especially when you know that the measurements are a bit noisy; an aircraft flying a straight line does typically create a somewhat randomly jagged line.

Now suppose we want to add a second radar to the mix, because the coverage area of a single radar is not big enough. Now we have a situation where there is a common coverage area where the two radars provide overlapping coverage.

In an ideal world, this would show the detections exactly in line with each other. However, each radar has their biases are other measurements error (with various sources, partly external to the radar system). So instead of one track for one aircraft, we end up having two tracks for one aircraft, sometimes a mile apart. This is of course not ideal and can even lead to safety risks.

A simple solution is to have a mosaic system; in such a system there is for each geographical area exactly one radar appointed to provide the surveillance data to the air traffic control's display. The down side of such a solution is that at the edge of the mosaic tiles, when the aircraft moves from one radar area into another, the track may jump because of the differences in measurement errors in both radars. Again not an ideal situation.

That is where radar fusion comes in. In a multi radar tracker, data from multiple radar is combined into a single track. In the process, biases and other measurements errors are greatly reduced, resulting in a track that generally much smoother than a single sensor track. Because of the identification of radar biases, there is no discontinuity (jump) when track move out of coverage of one radar. And due to the higher rate of updates from multiple radars, the update on the radar screen can often be increased as well.

The fused radar track is no longer a depiction of detected positions, but calculated estimate of where the aircraft is based on data from all radar (or other sensors) used in the fusion process. The mathematical process behind the fusion often uses on a form of Kalman Filtering, highly adapted for this task. Outliers are discarded to improve the smoothness of the track.

Trackers like ARTAS or Phoenix do not only fuse radar data into the track, but also include data from ADS-B and Wide-Area Multilateration (WAM). We then speak about a (fused) multi-sensor track instead.


Relative to commercial flight tracking, what this means is that observations from different air surveillance zones are combined to provide a single track of motion for the flight. For example, the major mode S sensing radars in the United States have the following sites:

enter image description here

As you can see there are many different radars. To track a flight that moves across the country, the information from many different radars has to be combined and correlated. This is called "data fusion".

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Citing references would improve this answer. $\endgroup$
    – J Walters
    Feb 1 '17 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ I also wonder—regarding your opening clause—how the commercial aspect of a flight relates to this topic? $\endgroup$
    – J Walters
    Feb 1 '17 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ @JonathanWalters In military contexts the term "fused track" can have different connotations than what I have explained in my answer. However, my guess is that the OP is asking about the fused tracks of civilian air carrier vehicles. $\endgroup$ Feb 1 '17 at 17:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I see. I would suppose "civil aviation" to be a better differentiator in that case since civil aviation radar tracking includes private, corporate, charter, and airline flights regardless of the commercial nature of the flight. $\endgroup$
    – J Walters
    Feb 1 '17 at 17:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.