What are the reasons to not just use one throttle lever for all engines?
1 Answer
All multi-engine airplanes, whether jet or prop driven have separate throttle controls for each engine. There are good reasons for this:
- If there is a problem with one engine you can separately control it for troubleshooting purposes
- If one engine isn't developing the right amount of power you can independently increase the other engine(s) to compensate
- If you have a control failure of some kind you can use differential thrust to steer the airplane, this has been done more than once, the example that comes immediately to mind is United 232
-
$\begingroup$ Most modern engines use digital electronic FADEC control. It would be very easy to have one thrust lever and still accommodate separate control for all the reasons given above. I have to assume the really reason might be something else. ( like tradition) $\endgroup$ Dec 17, 2016 at 14:38
-
2$\begingroup$ Differential thrust is also very helpful in taxi, not just in the event of control failure. I often use differential thrust as my primary directional control in taxi. $\endgroup$– J WDec 17, 2016 at 17:02
-
4$\begingroup$ @Mike Sowsun: Turn the question around, though, and ask whether there are any good reasons to have a single throttle control. I can't think of any, but then I'm used to just having one engine :-) $\endgroup$– jamesqfDec 17, 2016 at 19:46
-
$\begingroup$ To extend the question considering this answer and comments: are there devices that can selectively 'gang' all thrust levers, to avoid unintended differential settings? Like when a pilot wants to move all to TOGA but lets one slip? $\endgroup$ Dec 18, 2016 at 14:50
-
1$\begingroup$ @RobVermeulen, the levers are always made such that you can grab them all at once and move them together. In many aircraft the significant settings (TO/GA, MCT, FLEX, CLB and IDLE) also have detents to assist in precise positioning of the levers. $\endgroup$ Dec 19, 2016 at 19:25