As kinetic energy is not stored or recycled, large quantities of heat have to be evacuated in a short period of time when aircraft abort their takeoff or land:

enter image description here
B777 brake test, Youtube

Which approximate quantity of energy is transferred to the brakes in a rejected takeoff for heavy aircraft, e.g. Boeing 777 or Airbus A380? What are the typical systems used to cool brakes on these heavy aircraft? Is cooled air or liquid used, or just ram air?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ One set of brakes on an A380 converting kinetic energy into heat at 5 MW during a test: youtube.com/watch?v=m1dv_y_3EK0 $\endgroup$ – Nick T Dec 7 '16 at 16:53
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The amazing thing in that video is that a 5MW dynamometer exists $\endgroup$ – Johnny Dec 7 '16 at 17:06


The order of magnitude of brake energy after a rejected takeoff for a very heavy aircraft is 1 GJ, or 100 MJ per wheel brake.

Aircraft brakes are cooled with ambient air, either through passive airflow or (optionally) through forced air ventilation.

enter image description here

Cutaway drawings of A380 wheel and brake (Source)

Energy Dissipation

Takeoff speed for heavy aircraft is about 150 knots or 280 km/h. The maximum speed to reject takeoff ($V_1$) depends on the plane, the load, the wind, and the condition of the runway. Let's assume 150 knots for the sake of a rough energy estimation.

The maximum energy that could be transfered to the brakes is more or less the kinetic energy of the plane at takeoff speed: $$E_\rm{kinetic} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 $$

The actual energy dissipation will be increased by

  • remaining power delivered by engines
  • tail wind
  • runway downward slope

and decreased by

  • airbrakes
  • reverse thrust
  • head wind
  • runway upward slope
  • drag
  • tire heat dissipation and tire wear

Neither A380 nor B777 have brakes in the nose gear. (Actually very few heavy aircraft have braked nose wheels. See: Are there any aircraft with a nose wheel braking system?)

Airbus A380

The maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of the A380 is 575 t, and its main gear has 20 wheels. 16 main wheels have brakes and 4 main wheels do not. (See Why do some A380 main wheels have no brakes?)

$$E_\rm{TO,max} = 0.5\cdot 5.75\cdot 10^5\,\rm{kg}\cdot\left(\frac{280}{3.6}\frac{\rm{m}}{\rm{s}}\right)^2 = 1.7\,\rm{GJ}$$

The approximate maximum dissipated energy per wheel brake unit for an A380 after RTO is $$E_{\rm{wheel}} = \frac{1}{16} E_\rm{TO,max} = 110\,\rm{MJ} $$

Boeing 777

The MTOW of the heaviest 777 is 352 t, and its main gear has 12 wheels.

$$E_\rm{TO,max} = 0.5\cdot 3.52\cdot 10^5\,\rm{kg}\cdot\left(\frac{280}{3.6}\frac{\rm{m}}{\rm{s}}\right)^2 = 1.1\,\rm{GJ}$$

The approximate maximum dissipated energy per wheel brake unit for a Boing 777 after RTO is $$E_{\rm{wheel}} = \frac{1}{12} E_\rm{TO,max} = 89\,\rm{MJ} $$

Active Cooling

Aircraft which are foreseen to take-off and land frequently may be equipped with electric brake cooling fans (BCF) which extract the interior hot air to the exterior. The BCF are used during ground time to shorten the turn-around time.

As an example, the main wheels of an A318 equipped with electric brake cooling fans:

enter image description here

Interestingly, there is a difference between steel and carbon brake disks. Steel disks wear out faster when hot, whereas carbon disks wear out faster when cold. Therefore it is preferable to reduce the cooling of carbon disk brakes to what is required for the following takeoff (see this answer).

Passive Cooling

Many (long range) aircraft have no active brake cooling. Passive cooling is caused by

  • airstream (induced by wind or aircraft motion),
  • convection,
  • thermal conduction,
  • thermal radiation.

Passive cooling of aircraft brakes follows Newton's law of cooling, which is - in terms of mathematics - an exponential decay (or exponential function with a negative exponent, if you prefer).

It may take many hours of passive cooling to reach the ambient temperature. Also see related question What is the temperature of the brakes after a typical landing?

enter image description here
The source of this graph does not indicate the unit of the x-axis, but minutes seem most plausible. The type of the aircraft under test is also unknown. The information is applicable to a range of Airbus aircraft equipped with carbon disk brakes, from A300 to A380.

External Cooling

External ventilation units exist and may be used whenever necessary. These can be electric, petrol powered,

enter image description here

or supplied by a remote compressor or extractor:

enter image description here

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Both of the answers in this thread so far are simply outstanding in their thoroughness. Very well done! $\endgroup$ – Jules Dec 7 '16 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for the possibly silly question, but I'm no expert. The unit on the horizontal axis of the graph in the "passive cooling" section is minutes or hours? From the text on the graph and common sense I would assume minutes, but you talk about "many hours" in the previous text (or maybe I didn't understand the assumptions). $\endgroup$ – Lorenzo Donati Dec 8 '16 at 8:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @LorenzoDonati Not silly at all. The x-axis is unlabeled in the source document, but minutes are plausbile. The first landing is at 70'. The cooling follows the law of exponential decay. If there was no 2nd takeoff, it would take approx. 2h to cool down to 100 dC (somewhere after 200'), and more hours to get down to ambient temperature. $\endgroup$ – bogl Dec 8 '16 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ @LorenzoDonati I added a caption to address your question. $\endgroup$ – bogl Dec 8 '16 at 12:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LorenzoDonati Has to be minutes. No ordinary aircraft could stay aloft for that many hours. $\endgroup$ – Loren Pechtel Dec 9 '16 at 2:30

Hot brakes are normally cooled by natural convection, but in extreme cases the fire fighters will cool overheated brakes. Some designs use brake fans. From the linked page:

Brake fans reduce brake cooling times by using wheel mounted electric fans to blow ambient air across the brake and wheel assemblies. Note that the maximum recommended temperature for takeoff as indicated on the instrument panel may have a different value dependent on if the brake fans have been used or not.

Safran brake cooling fan and electric motor

Safran brake cooling fan and electric motor (picture source)

According to this page on Airliners.net, the BAe 146 had them, as did PanAm's A310s, but most airlines leave them off to save some weight. Short-haul aircraft make more use of cooling fans: According to this article and video, 90% of A320 use cooling fans. There are also ground-based cooling fans to shorten turn-around times.

The most severe case used in the design is a rejected take-off. Some energy is absorbed by rubbing off the tires, but most ends up in the brake disks. To absorb all this energy, sometimes more disks have to be added in the design phase. The most extreme example is the landing gear of the Tupolev 144 which sported the unusual combination of a high take-off and landing speed and no thrust reversers.

Tupolev Tu-144 landing gear

Tupolev Tu-144 landing gear (picture source) Yes, it is this bird!

As always, not all use cases can be foreseen by the designers. The reason why aviation hydraulic fluid must be non-flammable is one case when the heat energy was absorbed by the surrounding structure, with fatal consequences. In this particular case in 1963, a Sud Aviation Caravelle had tried to heat away fog on the runway so they could take off. They did this by taxiing down the runway with considerable thrust and used the brakes to keep the aircraft from accelerating. When the gear was retracted, the brake disks were still glowing red but had little to no air cooling. So the heat dissipated into the aluminium wheel hubs, which became too soft to withstand the tire pressure. Shrapnel from the burst wheels cut hydraulic lines, and the still glowing brake disks ignited the oil which was pumped into the wheel well. The resulting fire destroyed the aircraft.

From the accident report:

Four minutes later witnesses on the ground noticed a whitish trail of smoke on the left side of the aircraft and suddenly a long flame from the left wing-root. Around 0620 hours the aircraft reached an altitude of approximately 2700 m, it then began to lose height, entered a gentle left turn loosing height more rapidly and finally went into a steep dive.

This is why dragging brakes on retractable gears are dangerous: After take-off the wheel and brake is retracted, so air cannot cool it down anymore.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Peter, thanks for these interesting facts. I wish I could select two answers. $\endgroup$ – mins Dec 7 '16 at 18:22
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @mins: You selected the right answer. I never calculated the energy and just added some lore. Especially the Tu-144 which ended up in Tatarstan never ceases to amaze me. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Dec 7 '16 at 20:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great answer! I noticed a bug though: the link in "From the accident report:" points to the photograph of the Tu-144 landing gear, not to the accident report. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Duggan Dec 8 '16 at 14:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KevinDuggan Thank you very much - this happened because I manually edited the link and later add more before. Fixed. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Dec 8 '16 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ ? If it's a safety issue that hot brakes sometimes do need to be cooled after being retracted, then it seems plausible for there to be openable venting on the underside of the aircraft, so that some air is either rammed through the wheel compartment or on-brake electric fans can run and push the heat outside without affecting thrust. $\endgroup$ – Dale Mahalko Dec 10 '16 at 22:50

As others have answered, typically brakes are cooled by natural convection. For single-aisle and especially regional aircraft, these are designed to cool to taxi-out temperatures in the time it takes to deboard and reboard the aircraft. For certain aircraft, cooling may be the determining factor in when aircraft depart the gate, which is where temperature management schemes come into play.

Operators have two options when it comes to temperature management. The first is a chart published by the airframer, which is used to estimate the cooling time based on the landing energy and ambient conditions. However, this chart is usually conservative due to uneven heat distribution in brakes, so most operators choose the optional Brake Temperature Monitoring System upgrade. This option uses a temperature sensor called a thermocouple to determine the actual temperature of the brake linings (sometimes called the heatsink). This is integrated with the Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) so the pilots know when it is acceptable to taxi out.

The consequences of excessive heat in brakes have already been mentioned. After the Sud Aviation incident, the industry introduced fuse plugs into aircraft wheels. These contain a eutectic material which melts and releases tire pressure prior to wheel rupture. Aircraft tires are inflated with nitrogen, the release of which suppresses any fire which might occur.

For those interested in what happens when fuse plugs do not operate properly, here is a video:

  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome. Not sure about which airport this is. I used to work for the company that manufactured the brakes, but it happened before I joined on. $\endgroup$ – Rosswasright Dec 14 '16 at 3:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.