7
$\begingroup$

Some time ago when I was designing the approach radar module for the ATC simulator for HCAA, the spec was very clear that the limit had to be placed at 45 degrees. So I took it for granted and I didn't make any research of my own.

But very recently I had a discussion that made me wondering and I couldn't find any online documentation. I found Lnafziger's answer suggesting that

Controllers may issue a heading or a course direct to a fix between the IF and FAF at intercept angles not greater than 30 degrees for both conventional and RNAV instrument approaches

So I guess this is it for FAA airspace. But I would like to know if there are any EASA regulations or ICAO recommendations that impose 45 degrees in Europe.

$\endgroup$
9
$\begingroup$

45 degrees.

8.9.3.6

Aircraft vectored for final approach should be given a heading or a series of headings calculated to close with the final approach track. The final vector shall enable the aircraft to be established in level flight on the final approach track prior to intercepting the specified or nominal glide path if an MLS, ILS or radar approach is to be made, and should provide an intercept angle with the final approach track of 45 degrees or less.

ICAO Doc 4444 (PANS-ATM)

That said, we very often use a 30 degree intercept angle, even if we are allowed to go up to 45 degrees.

|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.