10
$\begingroup$

What are these 12 aircraft at the co-ordinates 35.677323, -117.676903?

I recognize the F-111 and C-130, but not the others.

enter image description here Source: google maps

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking about the Naval Air Weapons Station - China Lake? $\endgroup$ – SMS von der Tann Nov 2 '16 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ There is no C-130 in the photo - I'm looking at the upper right as the suspect. A 130: (1) its fuselage does not taper in the back. (2) its fuselage is proportionally wider (3) its wing is high-mounted, it hides that part of the fuselage as seen from the top.(4) its engine nacelles are more streamlined, being a turbine. Those in the photo look like radial piston to me. $\endgroup$ – radarbob Nov 4 '16 at 22:53
22
$\begingroup$

This answer is a Community Wiki. Community edits are welcome.


The aircraft in the photo appear to be the following, or varients therof:

  1. Douglas R4D-8 (Super DC-3)

R4D-8 at China Lake

source, photographer: Brian Lockett

  1. North American T-39 Sabreliner

  2. Boeing C-97 Stratofreighter or KC-97 tanker varient

  3. McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II

F-4 at China Lake

source, photographer: Brian Lockett

  1. Vought F-8 Crusader

  2. North American T-39 Sabreliner

  3. North American RA-5C Vigilante tail number 156640

RA-5C

source, photographer: Brian Lockett

  1. Boeing B-29 Superfortress

B-29

source, photographer: Brian Lockett

  1. General Dynamics F-111B tail number 152715

F-111

source, photographer: Brian Lockett

  1. Grumann A-6 Intruder

  2. Douglas R4D-8 (Super DC-3)

  3. Grumann A-6 Intruder

No C-130 appears in the photo included in the question, though one may appear elsewhere near the coordinates linked.

Notes:

  • 1 and 11 are not C-47 Skytrain. They are longer and have a square tail which is typically for the Super DC3 / R4D-8
  • 3 is longer from the wing root to the nose than the same measurement on 8, supporting that 3 is not a B-29. Moreover, in the photo of 7, aircraft 3 appears in the background which clearly shows engine nacelles like those of the B-50 or C-97 series. The same photo shows a fuselage rising higher above the wing than a B-50, which is consistent with a C-97 variant.
  • 5 measures nearer the 54 ft in length of an F-8, versus the 46 ft in length of an F-7, supporting that it is an F-8
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ 3 looks more like the B-50 and 8 looks like the B-29 $\endgroup$ – SMS von der Tann Nov 2 '16 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ 7 looks like a model of an early VFX/VFAX prototype; what would become the F-14. While swing-wing for speed and space, and dual-tail for maneuverability and stability, were both the vogue at the time, Grumman had designs for single-tail and fixed-wing variants of the VFX fighter carried forward from the doomed F-111B project. $\endgroup$ – KeithS Nov 2 '16 at 18:03
  • $\begingroup$ 10 and 12 are definitely A-6's by the way. You can make out the fixed probe on the left side of the cockpit, and the fuselage and strake lines are a dead giveaway. $\endgroup$ – KeithS Nov 2 '16 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @KeithS on bing maps it looks like it has one vertical stabilizer and I found a photo of the remains of an F 111B at China Lake. It seems to me that this is an 111B. $\endgroup$ – DeltaLima Nov 2 '16 at 18:08
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Good job on finding the ground photos $\endgroup$ – slebetman Nov 3 '16 at 2:25
2
$\begingroup$

1,11- Douglas C-47 Skytrain

2,6- North American Sabreliner

3,8 - B-29 Superfortress

4- McDonnel Douglas F-4 Phantom II

5- Vought A-7 Corsair II

7- North American Vigilante

9- General Dynamics F111 Aardvark

10,12- Grumman A-6 Intruder

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ 1 and 11 are not C-47 Skytrain. They are longer and have a square tail which is typically for the Super DC3 or R4D-8 $\endgroup$ – DeltaLima Nov 2 '16 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ 9 is an F-14 Tomcat. Note the single piece canopy vs. the Aardvark's split canopy, as well as the dual vertical stabilizers (the Aardvark only has one). $\endgroup$ – SnakeDoc Nov 2 '16 at 19:28
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @SnakeDoc I only see one vertical stabilizer on 9. The intakes on 9 also do not match the F-14. I think this answer is correct on this being an F-111. $\endgroup$ – J Walters Nov 2 '16 at 19:40
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ 3 is not a B-29, but a B-50. $\endgroup$ – J Walters Nov 2 '16 at 20:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @SnakeDoc The aircraft is definitely an F-111. The Tomcat has very pronounced intakes where the wings meet the fuselage. The F-111 does not. If it were an F-14, you would see two "shoulders" for the intakes just behind the canopy. The F-111's intakes are underneath the wings, not in front like the Tomcat. $\endgroup$ – Ron Beyer Nov 2 '16 at 21:55
0
$\begingroup$
  1. Douglas DC-3/C-47
  2. North American T-39 SaberLiner
  3. Boeing KC-97
  4. McDonnell Douglas F-4
  5. Vought F8U/RF8U Crusader
  6. North American T-39 SaberLiner
  7. North American A-5/RA-5 Vigilante
  8. Either a Boeing B-29 or a B-50 Superfortress
  9. General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark
  10. Either a Grumman A-6 or a KA-6 Intruder.
  11. Douglas DC-3/C-47
  12. Either a Grumman A-6 or a KA-6 Intruder.
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Confirm 7 is a North American A3J - A-5 - RA5 Vigilante. Looks a lot like a hot, 1960s fighter, a F-14, MiG-25, or F-15. I've read that Soviet espionage delivered enough A3J information that TsAGI based the MiG-25 shape on it. That's slightly odd, the A3J was a supersonic bomber with a deterrence role, like TSR-2. But Navy requirements included max weight catapult launches from an ANCHORED aircraft carrier. Deterrence means ready to go, 24/7. This was when the USAF had nuclear-armed bombers airborne, 24/7.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.