Do commercial airlines routinely travel at altitudes specified by the ATC based on the direction they are heading? Example: eastbound flights travel at odd levels and westbound flights travel at even ones?

  • $\begingroup$ I remember there was another question here addressing this, I just can't pick it out. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 17, 2016 at 0:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: How are aircraft separated at high altitude? $\endgroup$
    – user14897
    Commented Sep 17, 2016 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ Please consider clarifying your question if you do not feel the provided answers include the information you were looking for. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2016 at 18:38

2 Answers 2


In addition to ymb1's excellent answer, here are a few thoughts from the controller perspective.

Various rules and regulations for cruising level allocations exist. For flightplanning purposes, the semicircular rules are very notable. As pointed out by ymb1, the exact rules vary from place to place. In some regions, flights flying on a westbound track shall plan to fly at even levels while flights flying eastbound shall plan to fly at odd levels. Note that this is in relation to the magnetic track of the aircraft, except in areas near the poles. In some countries it is the other way around, in others, the rule is north/south instead of east/west.

AIP Denmark ENR 1.7

Example of a general east-odd/west-even rule (excerpt from AIP Denmark)

You can also have specific ATS routes, such as airways, that require you to flightplan certain levels that deviate from the general rule.

AIP Germany ENR 3.3

Example of ATS route which enforces even levels for eastbound flights (excerpt from AIP Germany)

It is important to note that rules for level allocations are mainly used for planning purposes. When filing a flightplan, the planned levels must obey any such rules - and you should always stick to your filed flightplan when in uncontrolled airspace.

However, when being provided with air traffic control service, the controller may deviate from the general rules if so desired (unless the local operating procedures do not allow it). If I have an upcoming conflict that can be solved by climbing a westbound flight to FL370, then I will be more than happy to do so - especially because establishing vertical separation is often the easiest way of solving a conflict. As long as the flight is within my sector, then I make the rules, so to say.

radar screenshot

Example of ATC radar screen with eastbound traffic (SAS528) flying at an even level (FL340) for separation

When transferring a flight to the next sector (or another unit), the controller is responsible for making sure the flight is at an appropriate level in accordance with the local letters of agreement. Principally, this means that we have to go back to the published rules (east odd, west even or specific airway rules). In practise, though, if it is desired to transfer a flight on a non-standard level, all it takes is a phone call to the next sector to check if they can accept it. If the next sector has no conflicting traffic, then there is nothing wrong with keeping the flight at a non-standard level.

So to sum it up, when planning a flight, you have to obey the published level allocation rules, which vary from place to place. A large part of the world uses the east-odd, west-even rule. But once under ATC control, there is no need to worry if you are assigned a non-standard cruising level - if that happens, it is because it is allowed and has been coordinated.


The answer is yes they're separated, but not necessarily with the East/West Odd/Even rule.

Exceptions to the rule are:

  1. The airway is one-way: For example North Atlantic Tracks and some over land airways are by design one-way.

  2. Flights above FL410: 2000 feet of separation is used. Which makes all flight levels odd numbered, →410, ←430, →450, etc.

  3. If the country's geography and/or most common airways are oriented North/South. For example France, New Zealand, and many others. Even then there is no fixed rule for whether North or South should be odd. As far as I know France and New Zealand (as an example) are different in that aspect.

Before RVSM came along, flights above FL290 were separated by 2000 feet, compared to 1000 feet below FL290.

RVSM is simply a reduction from 2000 to 1000 between FL290 and FL410 as long as the aircraft is certified for RVSM, i.e. shows that—among other things—the altimeters maintain their accuracy. The higher up you went in the old days, the less accurate an altimeter became.

  1. China (and maybe other countries) use the metric system, which adds another variation to the system.

When a plane flies from A to B, each airspace (FIR) it enters, the crew follows the local rules, and the fight plan also reflects that of course.

Since there are so many FIR's, no one credible free source—to my knowledge—accurately lists all of the direction rules.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ AFAIK Russia has switched to feet-based flight levels, though they are using metres below transition. China and some other Asian countries do use metric flight levels. $\endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Commented Sep 17, 2016 at 9:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .