Let's assume:

My plan is to climb to 6000 as filed but I can't turn northbound on course because of obstacles. When can I turn on course? Is the proper procedure to fly the back side of the localizer westbound till I reach 6000 and then turn?

  • $\begingroup$ I believe the proper procedure is to continue as cleared/filed unless there is some other kind of emergency that requires you to turn back. For altitudes, you do either the assigned altitude, expected altitude, or minimum enroute altitude. If your comms radios fail, try listening to nearby NDB/VOR's because ATC may try to contact you over them. You may not be able to respond, but you can still comply/signal through turns or ident. $\endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    Aug 1, 2016 at 3:20
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ See AIM Section 4: 6-4-1 and FAR 91.185 $\endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    Aug 1, 2016 at 3:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is almost a dupe of this question $\endgroup$
    – Pondlife
    Aug 1, 2016 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ Assigned. Vectored. Expected. Filed. flown at the highest of the min. enroute, expected, or assigned altitude. Otherwise, anything you, as pilot in command, determine is appropriate to meet the situation. $\endgroup$ Aug 2, 2016 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ That is what I said on the oral. However, wa $\endgroup$
    – Mike Hood
    Aug 2, 2016 at 1:20

3 Answers 3


Your assumptions are insufficient.

If your clearance just states "CLIMB 6000 direct", and there are obstacles along the route, you have been given an incorrect clearance.

It should have included the phrase "EXPECT" and an altitude and possibly also a time that would permit you to clear the obstacles.

Also, from your Skyvector link, it looks the Direct course parallels V97 very closely, which has an MEA of 5000, so you should not encounter any obstacles at 6,000. Once you reach your clearance limit LOZ, you may initiate the approach.

enter image description here

Nevertheless If you lose comms you are expected to climb to the hugest altitude of 1. Your last clearance altitude 2. Minimum IFR altitude. 3. The altitude you were told to expect


No, you will squawk 7600 and continue on your flight plan to your destination as filed. The airspace has already been cleared for you during your flight time.

  • $\begingroup$ This is not correct. If he got "cleared direct" he has been issued an amended clearance, which is what ATC expects him to fly $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Aug 1, 2016 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ This answer, while technically correct, isn't helpful because it doesn't address the main question of obstacle clearance. $\endgroup$ Nov 13, 2018 at 23:17

The obvious answer is: turn on course when you can safely do so. In reality, though, you - hopefully! - shouldn't find yourself in this situation anyway, because it would mean that something strange happened with your clearance.

Your question is a bit unclear because you didn't say exactly what the full departure clearance - or most recent clearance - was but as far I know "cleared direct KLOZ" isn't a valid departure clearance. The ATC orders (section 4-2-5) say that "cleared direct" is only used for amending a previous clearance and ATC must include the route of flight in your initial one (section 4-3-2):

d. Route of flight. Specify one or more of the following:
1. Airway, route, course, heading, azimuth, arc, or vector.
2. The routing a pilot can expect if any part of the route beyond a short range clearance limit differs from that filed.

So your departure clearance should have both the clearance limit (KLOZ) and the route, maybe something like this:

N12345 is cleared to the London-Corbin airport as filed, via radar vectors, then direct. Altitude 2500, expect 6000 within 10 minutes, departure frequency 123.9, squawk 1234. Clearance void if not off before 1200Z.

Obviously the details may be different, but the point is that if ATC didn't give you specific instructions on the initial route - even if it was just to expect vectors - then you should have asked for them. Otherwise you're taking off into IMC with no idea which direction to fly in. KDKX is uncontrolled and there's no tower to give you an initial heading after takeoff, but it would be surprising if you didn't get something in your clearance, considering that taking off from 24 puts you under McGhee Tyson's class C almost immediately.

But let's say that you got the clearance I mentioned above and your comms failure happens after you enter IMC but before you can contact Knoxsville Approach for your vectors. 14 CFR 91.85 says you should fly:

If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of radio failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance;


In the absence of an assigned route or a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance, by the route filed in the flight plan.

That means ATC will expect you to fly directly to KLOZ but obviously they don't expect you to fly into a hillside or transmission tower if it's in your way (and they know as well as you do that those obstacles are there). As PIC you have to make a decision on what the safest thing to do is in the situation, considering the class C nearby, any traffic you heard (or can still hear), local weather conditions and your aircraft's capabilities. Personally, after squawking 7600 I would make a left turn back east - to remain clear of the class C and the towers NW of the field - and climb over or east of KDKX until reaching a safe en route altitude. Then I would continue directly to KLOZ as filed, still climbing if necessary to reach my cruising altitude. But that's just one option, another 'obvious' one would be to fly the published ODP:

Rwy 26, climb heading 245° to intercept VXV R-275 to 3100 before proceeding on course or for climb in visual conditions cross Knoxville Downtown Island Airport at or above 3300 before proceeding on course.

But if I hadn't briefed the ODP - which I should have, especially in relatively low IMC - because I was expecting vectors, there's no way I would try to dig it out and brief it on the spur of the moment.

  • $\begingroup$ as far I know "cleared direct KLOZ" isn't a valid departure clearance -- not correct at all. Box 8 on the Flight Plan can have the word "DIRECT" for aircraft properly equipped. You'll get "via departure procedure, direct". Have done this all the time /G aircraft. $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Aug 6, 2016 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @rbp Yes, I've been cleared direct when /G too. But as far as I can remember, I've also always been given an initial heading or been asked what heading I plan to fly. Or, as you said, been given a DP to fly. And that's what I was really trying to say: being cleared direct with no instruction or request for an initial heading seems really odd to me. But maybe you've had different experiences from me, I think a lot of practical details depend on where and how you fly. $\endgroup$
    – Pondlife
    Aug 6, 2016 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ pond -- I completely agree. that being said, if you are departing IFR from an uncontrolled field, and there is no obstacle departure, then you fly what is called a diverse departure, which means you can climb out in any direction so long as you meet the ROC requirements for IFR for the Part you are flying. See faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/… (p. 1-14) $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Aug 7, 2016 at 2:13
  • $\begingroup$ (con't) That means that if you file from ABC airport to XYZ airport, Direct then when you phone FSS to pick up your clearance, you should just get "Cleared to XYZ airport, direct." or Maybe "..as filed". $\endgroup$
    – rbp
    Aug 7, 2016 at 2:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.