12
$\begingroup$

A couple of years ago a UH-60 managed an auto-rotation landing with "badly damaged rotor blades." (Couldn't find further details on that incident.)

Is it ever possible to auto-rotate in a helicopter that has lost a segment or entire blade of a main rotor?

My guess is that, in general, it would be impossible to control the lift asymmetries and such in-flight damage would always result in an uncontrollable crash. If that's correct, then what about the special case of a helicopter with 4 or 6 main rotor blades, and if it were possible to jettison the blade opposing the one that was lost or damaged? (Are any helicopters equipped with an emergency ability to jettison rotors in flight, other than the ones with vertical ejection seats?) Is it known whether such a damaged rotorcraft can reliably auto-rotation in that scenario?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I found another view of the damage. I reckon any rotary pilot would look at that and ask how they walked away. I certainly do. Remarkable. $\endgroup$ – Simon Jul 22 '16 at 6:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ That incident was a complete freak. It looks like a delamintation of the trailing edge of the blade with subsequent loss of large portions. The UH60 has a fully articulated head which allows for the blades to move freely and independently up and down and forwards and backwards as they rotate. With power removed (the pilot entered autorotation), the enormous out of balance forces generated were absorbed by the hinges (we know this because the thing didn't disintegrate). In summary, they are alive because they had 4 blades on an strong articulated head and a huge dose of good fortune. $\endgroup$ – Simon Jul 22 '16 at 7:00
12
$\begingroup$

Highly improbable. If you've ever seen how much a washing machine can shake with a little imbalance in the laundry, at a relatively low energy spin, imagine the destructive forces that would be experienced by the imbalances in your theoretical rotors. Even if your missing blade manages to get away without causing impact damage to the other blades, there is going to be an immediate violent force translated through the aircraft. Your newly configured rotor formation is still going to try to spin around its center of mass, which is no longer concentric with the mast. The degree of imbalance will tell you how far off center the new center of rotation wants to be. The mast is still going to be trying to keep the rotor rotating on its own center, so now the rotor and mast are fighting to circle their common center, and basically this means the rotor, it it doesnt just go to pieces from all this force, will be yanking HARD and fast on the mast, which would probably rip it off the airframe.... but, if your magic rotor and mast stay intact, the violent motion would be translated to the airframe which will now be shaking super violently around you, which would likely cause it to rapidly disassemble. If it magically stayed together, the people inside (hello pilot) would be experiencing forces through the body like riding the paint shaker at the hardware store, but harder and farther, if not faster, on every shake. Watch that paint shaker and imagine your head being in that.

I do not believe your scenario would be survivable, even on the ground. It's odd to think, but a complete rotor disintegration is not the worst thing that could happen after blade loss.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah, the rapid unplanned disassembly. Happens every once in a while in spaceflight, too. space.stackexchange.com/q/10022/415 $\endgroup$ – a CVn Jul 22 '16 at 8:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Every once in a while" in space flight? Clearly you've never watched me play Kerbal Space Program $\endgroup$ – Jon Story Aug 2 '16 at 0:51
  • $\begingroup$ @JonStory: Quick, revert to VAB! $\endgroup$ – Sean May 20 '18 at 0:04
9
$\begingroup$

It would be impossible. A rotor blade that has lost a large segment, or entire blade of a main rotor, would be so badly out of balance that it would immediately self destruct.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.